This statistics worksheet uses a riddle format to help students practice identifying true and false statements regarding various sampling techniques.

Let’s go step by step through each statement and decide if it’s True (T) or False (F). Then we’ll collect the words at the end of the true statements in order to solve the riddle.

---

Statement 1:

“By drawing a simple random sample, one is assured of freedom from sampling errors.” (LISTEN)
→ ✘ False. Simple random sampling reduces bias but does NOT eliminate sampling error — that’s always possible due to chance.
→ Word “LISTEN” is not used.

---

Statement 2:

“Using volunteers as the subjects in a study is an example of simple random sampling from the population to which the volunteers belong.” (TOO)
→ ✘ False. Volunteers are self-selected — this is convenience or voluntary response sampling, NOT simple random sampling.
→ Word “TOO” is not used.

---

Statement 3:

“In simple random sampling, each individual in a population has an equal chance of being drawn.” (CHECK)
→ ✔ True. That’s the definition of simple random sampling.
→ First true word: CHECK

---

Statement 4:

“Using students you happen to meet on campus as a sample of all students on campus is an example of biased sampling.” (YOU)
→ ✔ True. This is convenience sampling — not representative, so it’s biased.
→ Second true word: YOU

---

Statement 5:

“If one draws a simple random sample, one is assured of freedom from bias in sampling.” (SEE)
→ ✘ False. While SRS minimizes selection bias, it doesn’t guarantee zero bias (e.g., nonresponse bias can still occur). Also, “assured of freedom” is too strong.
→ Word “SEE” is not used.

Wait — let’s double-check this. In many intro stats courses, they teach that *simple random sampling eliminates selection bias*. But technically, other biases (like measurement or nonresponse) can still exist. However, for this level, maybe they consider it true? Let’s hold off and check others first.

Actually, looking ahead — if we mark this as true, then “SEE” becomes part of the answer. But let’s compare with standard teaching.

Standard textbook view: Simple random sampling ensures no *selection* bias — meaning every member has equal chance, so no systematic favoritism. So perhaps in this context, it’s considered TRUE.

But wait — statement #1 said “freedom from sampling errors” — which is false because sampling error ≠ bias. Sampling error is natural variation; bias is systematic error.

So statement #5 says “freedom from bias” — which might be acceptable as true in basic stats.

BUT — let’s look at statement #6:

---

Statement 6:

“The effects of a serious bias in sampling can be overcome by using a very large sample.” (TALK)
→ ✘ False. Bias is systematic — bigger sample just makes the biased result more precise, not correct. You can’t fix bias with size.
→ Word “TALK” is not used.

---

Back to statement #5: If we say it’s true, then “SEE” is included. But let’s see what happens if we skip it for now.

Actually, let’s re-read carefully:
Statement #5: “assured of freedom from bias in sampling” — again, “assured” is too absolute. Even in SRS, if people don’t respond, or if questions are worded badly, bias can creep in. So probably FALSE in careful terms.

Many textbooks say SRS avoids *selection bias*, but not all types of bias. Since the statement says “bias in sampling” generally, it’s misleading → likely FALSE.

We’ll keep it as False for now.

---

Statement 7:

“In stratified random sampling, individuals are drawn at random separately from each stratum.” (IF)
→ ✔ True. That’s exactly how stratified sampling works — divide into groups (strata), then randomly sample within each.
→ Third true word: IF

---

Statement 8:

“Simple random sampling is generally considered to be far superior to stratified random sampling.” (HEAR)
→ ✘ False. Stratified sampling is often *more* precise when strata are homogeneous. It’s not “far superior” — depends on situation. Often stratified is better.
→ Word “HEAR” is not used.

---

Statement 9:

“The process of dividing a population into strata for the purpose of stratified random sampling introduces bias into the sampling process.” (THEM)
→ ✘ False. Properly done, stratification reduces variability and doesn’t introduce bias — it’s a valid method.
→ Word “THEM” is not used.

---

Statement 10:

“The primary reasons for using biased sampling techniques are convenience and economy.” (YOUR)
→ ✔ True. People use convenience samples (like asking friends, online polls) because they’re easy and cheap — even though they’re biased.
→ Fourth true word: YOUR

---

Statement 11:

“A table of random numbers can be used to draw an unbiased sample only if one can first identify all members of the population of interest.” (TONGUE)
→ ✔ True. To use random numbers properly, you need a complete list (sampling frame) of the population. Otherwise, some people have zero chance — which creates bias.
→ Fifth true word: TONGUE

---

Statement 12:

“An 'accidental' (i.e., a sample of convenience) sample is an example of a probability sample.” (SPEECH)
→ ✘ False. Convenience/accidental samples are NON-probability samples — you don’t know the chance of selection. Probability samples require known, nonzero chances.
→ Word “SPEECH” is not used.

---

Statement 13:

“Stratified random sampling is usually more precise than simple random sampling.” (IS)
→ ✔ True. When strata are well-defined, stratified sampling reduces variance → more precise estimates.
→ Sixth true word: IS

---

Statement 14:

“Using listed telephone numbers as a basis for selecting a sample will yield a biased sample of the population of all residents in a city.” (TANNED)
→ ✔ True. Not everyone has a landline phone anymore — misses cell-only users, young people, etc. So it’s biased.
→ Seventh true word: TANNED

---

Now let’s list the TRUE statements and their ending words in order:

- #3: CHECK
- #4: YOU
- #7: IF
- #10: YOUR
- #11: TONGUE
- #13: IS
- #14: TANNED

That’s 7 words. The riddle asks: “How can you tell if you talk too much?” — and we’re supposed to write the answer putting one word per line.

So the answer should be:

CHECK
YOU
IF
YOUR
TONGUE
IS
TANNED

Wait — that doesn’t make sense as a sentence. Let’s read it aloud:

“Check you if your tongue is tanned”? That’s nonsense.

Hmm… did we miscount?

Let’s recount the true statements:

We had:

✔ #3: CHECK
✔ #4: YOU
✔ #7: IF
✔ #10: YOUR
✔ #11: TONGUE
✔ #13: IS
✔ #14: TANNED

That’s 7. But maybe statement #5 is actually TRUE?

Let’s revisit #5:
“If one draws a simple random sample, one is assured of freedom from bias in sampling.” (SEE)

In many high school or intro college stats classes, they teach that simple random sampling eliminates *selection bias*. And since “bias in sampling” often refers to selection bias in this context, maybe it’s intended to be TRUE.

Also, note that statement #1 was about “sampling errors” — which is different from bias — and that’s clearly false.

So perhaps #5 is meant to be TRUE.

Let’s try including it.

Then true statements would be:

#3: CHECK
#4: YOU
#5: SEE
#7: IF
#10: YOUR
#11: TONGUE
#13: IS
#14: TANNED

That’s 8 words.

Read them:
CHECK
YOU
SEE
IF
YOUR
TONGUE
IS
TANNED

Still weird.

Wait — maybe the riddle answer is:
“You know you talk too much if your tongue is tired” or something like that.

Another idea: Maybe “TANNED” is a typo or pun? Or maybe we missed a word.

Let’s look back at statement #2: “(TOO)” — we marked false, but what if...

No, volunteers are definitely not SRS.

What about statement #6? “TALK” — we said false, which is correct.

Perhaps the answer is:
CHECK
YOU
IF
YOUR
TONGUE
IS
TIRED? But “TANNED” is given.

Wait — “tanned tongue” isn’t a thing. But “tired tongue” is!

Maybe “TANNED” is a play on “tired”? Like, sun-tanned vs. tired? Unlikely.

Alternative approach: Let’s list all the words from TRUE statements in order and see if they form a coherent phrase.

Current best guess with 7 words:
CHECK YOU IF YOUR TONGUE IS TANNED — no.

With 8 including #5:
CHECK YOU SEE IF YOUR TONGUE IS TANNED — still odd.

Wait — what if statement #5 is FALSE, but statement #1 is TRUE? No, #1 is definitely false.

Another thought: Maybe “TANNED” is meant to be “TIRED”, and it’s a joke. Or perhaps we should ignore the literal meaning and just follow the logic.

Let’s count how many blanks are provided for the answer:

At the bottom:
“Write the answer to the riddle here, putting one word on each line:”

And there are 8 blank lines shown (in the image description, though not visible here, but typically such worksheets have matching blanks).

Looking back at the user's text:
"putting one word on each line:" followed by underscores — in the original image, there are 8 underscores arranged in two rows of four? Or three rows? The text says:

"________ ________ ________ ________
________ ________ ________ ________"

So 8 blanks.

Therefore, we need 8 true statements.

Which means we must have missed one.

Let’s re-evaluate statement #5.

Upon second thought, in many educational contexts, especially at this level, they consider simple random sampling to be free from *selection bias*, and since "bias in sampling" commonly refers to selection bias, statement #5 might be intended as TRUE.

Moreover, statement #1 explicitly says "sampling errors" — which is different — and is false.

So let’s accept #5 as TRUE.

Thus, true statements:

3: CHECK
4: YOU
5: SEE
7: IF
10: YOUR
11: TONGUE
13: IS
14: TANNED

Now, reading the words:
CHECK
YOU
SEE
IF
YOUR
TONGUE
IS
TANNED

Still not making sense.

Wait — perhaps the riddle answer is:
"You know you talk too much if your tongue is sore" — but "tanned" is given.

Another idea: Maybe "TANNED" is a homophone or pun for "tired"? In some dialects? Unlikely.

Perhaps we made a mistake in statement #14.

Statement #14: Using listed telephone numbers... yields biased sample — TRUE, yes.

What about statement #8? "SRS is far superior to stratified" — FALSE, correct.

Statement #9: Dividing into strata introduces bias — FALSE, correct.

Statement #12: Accidental sample is probability sample — FALSE, correct.

Statement #6