Free. Exclusive. Just for you.
Four unique services that make learning easier, faster, and smarter - only on our website.

Relative Frequency worksheet with exercises on calculating relative frequency and answering probability questions based on experimental data.

Worksheet titled "Relative Frequency" with two sections (A and B) containing tables for calculating relative frequency based on experimental data from dice rolls, spinner spins, car traffic, and counter draws, along with related questions.

Worksheet titled "Relative Frequency" with two sections (A and B) containing tables for calculating relative frequency based on experimental data from dice rolls, spinner spins, car traffic, and counter draws, along with related questions.

JPG 1811×2560 518 KB Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #488031
Show Answer Key & Explanations Step-by-step solution for: Relative Frequency Worksheet | PDF Printable Statistics ...
Explanation:
Let’s go step by step through each part.

---

Section A – Dice rolled 200 times

First, fill in the *Relative Frequency* column.
Relative Frequency = Frequency ÷ Total Trials
Total trials = 200.

- For outcome 1: 20 ÷ 200 = 0.10
- Outcome 2: 30 ÷ 200 = 0.15
- Outcome 3: 25 ÷ 200 = 0.125
- Outcome 4: 20 ÷ 200 = 0.10
- Outcome 5: 25 ÷ 200 = 0.125
- Outcome 6: 80 ÷ 200 = 0.40

So relative frequencies:
1 → 0.10
2 → 0.15
3 → 0.125
4 → 0.10
5 → 0.125
6 → 0.40

Now answer the questions:

1) If the dice were rolled 1000 times, how many times would you expect to get a score of 6?
Use the relative frequency from the experiment: 0.40
Expected count = 0.40 × 1000 = 400

2) Do you think the dice is fair? Why?
A fair 6-sided die should have each outcome ~1/6 ≈ 0.1667 relative frequency.
Here, outcome 6 has 0.40 — much higher than expected. Others are lower.
So: No, it’s not fair — outcome 6 appears far too often.

---

Section A – Five-sided spinner spun 120 times

Fill in relative frequencies (total = 120):

- 1: 26 ÷ 120 = 0.2167 (≈ 0.217)
- 2: 22 ÷ 120 = 0.1833 (≈ 0.183)
- 3: 19 ÷ 120 = 0.1583 (≈ 0.158)
- 4: 29 ÷ 120 = 0.2417 (≈ 0.242)
- 5: 24 ÷ 120 = 0.2000

(We’ll keep decimals to 3 places if needed, but for predictions, we can use fractions or decimals.)

3) If the spinner were spun 360 times, how many times would you expect to get a score of 2?
Relative frequency of 2 = 22/120 = 11/60
Expected = (11/60) × 360 = 11 × 6 = 66

4) Do you think the spinner is fair? Why?
A fair 5-sided spinner should give each outcome ~1/5 = 0.20
Observed:
1 → 0.217
2 → 0.183
3 → 0.158
4 → 0.242
5 → 0.200

These are somewhat close to 0.20, especially with only 120 trials. Differences could be due to chance.
But outcome 3 is quite low (0.158), and 4 is high (0.242). Still, not extremely off.
Answer: Probably fair, but not perfectly — small sample size means some variation is expected.

---

Section B – Color of cars passing traffic

Total cars = 13 + 34 + 25 + 10 + 8 = 90

Relative frequencies:
- Red: 13/90 ≈ 0.144
- Silver: 34/90 = 17/45 ≈ 0.378
- Black: 25/90 = 5/18 ≈ 0.278
- White: 10/90 = 1/9 ≈ 0.111
- Blue: 8/90 = 4/45 ≈ 0.089

1) What is the relative frequency of the next passing car being silver?
→ 34/90 = 17/45 or approximately 0.378

2) Estimate number of white cars if 4000 cars passed by?
Relative frequency of white = 10/90 = 1/9
Expected = (1/9) × 4000 = 4000 ÷ 9 ≈ 444.44, so about 444 cars (or 444–445; usually round to nearest whole number: 444)

---

Section B – Counter from bag (200 trials total)

Trials recorded every 50:
At 50 trials: 8 blue
At 100: 22
At 150: 48
At 200: 59

So total blue counters drawn in 200 trials = 59

Relative frequency after 200 trials = 59/200 = 0.295

3) Best estimate of probability of picking a blue counter?
Use the overall relative frequency: 59/200 = 0.295

4) Estimate probability of taking a blue counter from the bag.
Same as above: 0.295 (or 29.5%)

5) How to get a more accurate estimate?
Do more trials — the more times you repeat the experiment, the closer the relative frequency gets to the true probability (Law of Large Numbers).

---

Now compile all final answers clearly:

Final Answer:
1) 400
2) No, because 6 appears much more often (40%) than expected (≈16.7%).
3) 66
4) Probably fair; results are reasonably close to 20% each, though small sample causes some variation.
1) 34/90 or ≈0.378
2) ≈444
3) 59/200 = 0.295
4) 0.295
5) Increase the number of trials (e.g., repeat 1000 times instead of 200).
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of relative frequency worksheet.
Print Download

How to use

Click Print to open a print-ready version directly in your browser, or use Download to save the file to your device. The ⭐ Answer button generates an AI answer key instantly - useful for teachers who need a quick reference. Need a different version? Our AI Worksheet Generator lets you create a custom worksheet on any topic in seconds.

(view all relative frequency worksheet)

Two-Way Frequency Tables Notes and Worksheets - Lindsay Bowden
STEM
Relative Frequency Table Worksheet 1 -- Grade 5 -- 2020 Math Curriculum Ontario
Lesson 2.1.3 - Conditional Relative Frequencies and Association ...
Relative Frequency | Teaching Resources | Teaching resources ...
Relative Frequency Worksheet | PDF Printable Statistics ...
Relative Frequency and Expectation (Level 3) | Teaching Resources
Relative frequency worksheet | Live Worksheets
Two Way Relative Frequency Tables
Relative Frequency Tables Worksheets | Questions and Revision | MME