Sentence Types Worksheet for Grammar Practice
Worksheet on sentence types with instructions and examples for identifying subjects, predicates, and sentence structures.
JPG
1700×2200
248.2 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #588557
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Sentence Types Worksheet | Sentence Structure Activity
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Sentence Types Worksheet | Sentence Structure Activity
Let’s go through each sentence one by one. We’ll figure out what type of sentence it is based on the rules given:
- Simple Sentence: Only one clause (one subject + predicate).
- Compound Sentence: Two or more clauses joined by a coordinating conjunction (for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so).
- Complex Sentence: Two or more clauses joined by a subordinating conjunction (as, because, although, since, before, when, once, if, even if, whatever, whenever, during, until, unless, wherever, whether, while, as if, even if, that).
- Compound-Complex: Three or more clauses — must have at least one coordinating AND one subordinating conjunction.
We’ll also look for subjects and predicates, and separate clauses with a line where needed.
---
1. When I get home from school, I'm going to take a nap.
→ “When I get home from school” = dependent clause (starts with subordinating conjunction “when”)
→ “I’m going to take a nap” = independent clause
→ One subordinating conjunction → Complex Sentence
Sentence Type: Complex
---
2. I got in trouble so I can't go to the party, but it would have been fun.
Break it down:
- Clause 1: “I got in trouble” → independent
- Clause 2: “so I can’t go to the party” → “so” is coordinating → connects two independents? Wait — actually, “so” here is acting as a coordinating conjunction joining “I got in trouble” and “I can’t go to the party”. But then there’s “but” connecting another clause: “it would have been fun”.
So we have:
- “I got in trouble” (independent)
- “so I can’t go to the party” → this is still part of the first compound idea? Actually, let’s rephrase: The structure is:
“I got in trouble so I can’t go to the party” — this could be seen as one unit? No — better to split:
Actually, standard analysis:
- “I got in trouble” — independent
- “so I can’t go to the party” — “so” is coordinating → so this is second independent clause
- “but it would have been fun” — “but” is coordinating → third independent clause
Wait — that would make it three independent clauses joined by coordinating conjunctions → that’s Compound, not Compound-Complex, because no subordinating conjunction.
But wait — is “so” always coordinating? Yes, in this context. And “but” is coordinating.
So: Three independent clauses? Let’s check:
Clause A: I got in trouble
Clause B: I can’t go to the party (joined to A by “so”)
Clause C: it would have been fun (joined to B by “but”)
All are independent → so this is a Compound Sentence with three clauses? But definition says “two or more clauses joined by coordinating conjunction” — doesn’t say only two. So yes, still compound.
BUT — some might argue “so I can’t go to the party” is a result clause — but grammatically, “so” is listed as coordinating.
However, looking again: “I got in trouble so I can’t go to the party” — this is often treated as one compound sentence (two clauses), and then “but it would have been fun” adds a third clause.
So total: three independent clauses → still Compound Sentence? Or does having three make it something else?
Wait — the definition says:
> Compound Sentence: a sentence with two or more clauses joined by a coordinating conjunction.
It doesn’t limit to two. So even three is still compound.
BUT — hold on! Is there any subordinating conjunction? No. All conjunctions used are coordinating: “so”, “but”.
So this should be Compound.
Wait — but let me double-check common usage. Sometimes sentences like this are called compound-complex if they have multiple layers — but according to the worksheet’s own definition:
> Compound-Complex: three or more clauses joined by coordinating and subordinating conjunctions.
Here, NO subordinating conjunction → so cannot be compound-complex.
Therefore: Compound Sentence
Sentence Type: Compound
---
3. Being alone can be scary unless you keep yourself busy.
→ “Being alone can be scary” — independent clause
→ “unless you keep yourself busy” — dependent clause (“unless” is subordinating)
→ One subordinating conjunction → Complex Sentence
Sentence Type: Complex
---
4. Mr. Morton, the best reading teacher in the world, taught me sentence structure.
This has an appositive phrase: “the best reading teacher in the world” — which describes Mr. Morton. It’s not a separate clause — it’s just extra info within one clause.
Subject: Mr. Morton
Predicate: taught me sentence structure
Only one clause → Simple Sentence
Sentence Type: Simple
---
5. Keith, Carrie, and Kyle bought donuts and ate them down by the river.
Subject: Keith, Carrie, and Kyle (compound subject)
Predicates: bought donuts / ate them — connected by “and”
But note: This is ONE subject doing TWO actions — still considered ONE clause because there’s only one subject group and the verbs are coordinated.
No subordinate or additional independent clauses → Simple Sentence
Sentence Type: Simple
---
6. I left early so that I could get some work done, but I'll be back soon.
Breakdown:
- “I left early” — independent
- “so that I could get some work done” — “so that” is a subordinating conjunction → dependent clause
- “but I’ll be back soon” — “but” is coordinating → joins to previous independent clause?
Wait — structure:
Main clause: “I left early”
Dependent clause: “so that I could get some work done” → modifies why he left early
Then: “but I’ll be back soon” — this is another independent clause joined by “but”
So we have:
- Independent clause 1: I left early
- Dependent clause: so that I could get some work done
- Independent clause 2: I’ll be back soon
Joined by: subordinating (“so that”) and coordinating (“but”) → meets definition of Compound-Complex
Sentence Type: Compound-Complex
---
7. Crossing the street is dangerous if you don't look both ways before you cross.
“Crossing the street is dangerous” — independent
“if you don’t look both ways” — dependent (subordinating “if”)
“before you cross” — also dependent? Wait — “before” is subordinating too.
But note: “if you don’t look both ways before you cross” — this whole thing is one dependent clause modifying “dangerous”. Inside it, “before you cross” is embedded — but still, overall, only one main independent clause.
So: one independent + one or more dependent → still Complex Sentence
Sentence Type: Complex
---
8. If you don't want to study, you should stay home, but you may regret it.
Breakdown:
- “If you don’t want to study” — dependent (subordinating “if”)
- “you should stay home” — independent
- “but you may regret it” — independent (joined by coordinating “but”)
So: one dependent + two independent → uses both subordinating and coordinating conjunctions → Compound-Complex
Sentence Type: Compound-Complex
---
9. Every time I go to mall, I spend all of my money on things that I don't need.
“Every time I go to mall” — “every time” acts like a subordinating conjunction → dependent clause
“I spend all of my money...” — independent
“that I don’t need” — relative clause (also dependent, introduced by “that”) — but it’s inside the object of the main clause.
Still, only one independent clause → rest are dependent → Complex Sentence
Sentence Type: Complex
---
10. Mom said that I can go to the museum with you but I have to be home early.
“Mom said” — independent
“that I can go to the museum with you” — dependent (introduced by “that” — subordinating)
“but I have to be home early” — independent? Wait — how is it connected?
Actually, the structure is:
Mom said [that I can go... but I have to be home early]
The “but” is inside the noun clause — so “that I can go... but I have to be home early” is one big dependent clause (object of “said”), containing two parts joined by “but”.
So overall: one independent clause (“Mom said”) + one complex dependent clause → still only one independent clause → Complex Sentence
Wait — but let’s think: Is “I have to be home early” really dependent? In this case, yes — because it’s part of what Mom said. The whole thing after “that” is a single noun clause, even though it contains a contrast with “but”.
So: only one independent clause → Complex
Sentence Type: Complex
---
11. Modern Warfare is a fun game but no game is better than Ms. Pac-Man.
Two independent clauses:
- “Modern Warfare is a fun game”
- “no game is better than Ms. Pac-Man”
Joined by coordinating conjunction “but” → Compound Sentence
Sentence Type: Compound
---
12. Todd and Nick are eating chips and salsa on a park bench before dinner.
Subject: Todd and Nick
Predicate: are eating chips and salsa on a park bench
“before dinner” — prepositional phrase, not a clause
Only one clause → Simple Sentence
Sentence Type: Simple
---
Now, compiling final answers:
1. Complex
2. Compound
3. Complex
4. Simple
5. Simple
6. Compound-Complex
7. Complex
8. Compound-Complex
9. Complex
10. Complex
11. Compound
12. Simple
Final Answer:
1. Complex
2. Compound
3. Complex
4. Simple
5. Simple
6. Compound-Complex
7. Complex
8. Compound-Complex
9. Complex
10. Complex
11. Compound
12. Simple
- Simple Sentence: Only one clause (one subject + predicate).
- Compound Sentence: Two or more clauses joined by a coordinating conjunction (for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so).
- Complex Sentence: Two or more clauses joined by a subordinating conjunction (as, because, although, since, before, when, once, if, even if, whatever, whenever, during, until, unless, wherever, whether, while, as if, even if, that).
- Compound-Complex: Three or more clauses — must have at least one coordinating AND one subordinating conjunction.
We’ll also look for subjects and predicates, and separate clauses with a line where needed.
---
1. When I get home from school, I'm going to take a nap.
→ “When I get home from school” = dependent clause (starts with subordinating conjunction “when”)
→ “I’m going to take a nap” = independent clause
→ One subordinating conjunction → Complex Sentence
Sentence Type: Complex
---
2. I got in trouble so I can't go to the party, but it would have been fun.
Break it down:
- Clause 1: “I got in trouble” → independent
- Clause 2: “so I can’t go to the party” → “so” is coordinating → connects two independents? Wait — actually, “so” here is acting as a coordinating conjunction joining “I got in trouble” and “I can’t go to the party”. But then there’s “but” connecting another clause: “it would have been fun”.
So we have:
- “I got in trouble” (independent)
- “so I can’t go to the party” → this is still part of the first compound idea? Actually, let’s rephrase: The structure is:
“I got in trouble so I can’t go to the party” — this could be seen as one unit? No — better to split:
Actually, standard analysis:
- “I got in trouble” — independent
- “so I can’t go to the party” — “so” is coordinating → so this is second independent clause
- “but it would have been fun” — “but” is coordinating → third independent clause
Wait — that would make it three independent clauses joined by coordinating conjunctions → that’s Compound, not Compound-Complex, because no subordinating conjunction.
But wait — is “so” always coordinating? Yes, in this context. And “but” is coordinating.
So: Three independent clauses? Let’s check:
Clause A: I got in trouble
Clause B: I can’t go to the party (joined to A by “so”)
Clause C: it would have been fun (joined to B by “but”)
All are independent → so this is a Compound Sentence with three clauses? But definition says “two or more clauses joined by coordinating conjunction” — doesn’t say only two. So yes, still compound.
BUT — some might argue “so I can’t go to the party” is a result clause — but grammatically, “so” is listed as coordinating.
However, looking again: “I got in trouble so I can’t go to the party” — this is often treated as one compound sentence (two clauses), and then “but it would have been fun” adds a third clause.
So total: three independent clauses → still Compound Sentence? Or does having three make it something else?
Wait — the definition says:
> Compound Sentence: a sentence with two or more clauses joined by a coordinating conjunction.
It doesn’t limit to two. So even three is still compound.
BUT — hold on! Is there any subordinating conjunction? No. All conjunctions used are coordinating: “so”, “but”.
So this should be Compound.
Wait — but let me double-check common usage. Sometimes sentences like this are called compound-complex if they have multiple layers — but according to the worksheet’s own definition:
> Compound-Complex: three or more clauses joined by coordinating and subordinating conjunctions.
Here, NO subordinating conjunction → so cannot be compound-complex.
Therefore: Compound Sentence
Sentence Type: Compound
---
3. Being alone can be scary unless you keep yourself busy.
→ “Being alone can be scary” — independent clause
→ “unless you keep yourself busy” — dependent clause (“unless” is subordinating)
→ One subordinating conjunction → Complex Sentence
Sentence Type: Complex
---
4. Mr. Morton, the best reading teacher in the world, taught me sentence structure.
This has an appositive phrase: “the best reading teacher in the world” — which describes Mr. Morton. It’s not a separate clause — it’s just extra info within one clause.
Subject: Mr. Morton
Predicate: taught me sentence structure
Only one clause → Simple Sentence
Sentence Type: Simple
---
5. Keith, Carrie, and Kyle bought donuts and ate them down by the river.
Subject: Keith, Carrie, and Kyle (compound subject)
Predicates: bought donuts / ate them — connected by “and”
But note: This is ONE subject doing TWO actions — still considered ONE clause because there’s only one subject group and the verbs are coordinated.
No subordinate or additional independent clauses → Simple Sentence
Sentence Type: Simple
---
6. I left early so that I could get some work done, but I'll be back soon.
Breakdown:
- “I left early” — independent
- “so that I could get some work done” — “so that” is a subordinating conjunction → dependent clause
- “but I’ll be back soon” — “but” is coordinating → joins to previous independent clause?
Wait — structure:
Main clause: “I left early”
Dependent clause: “so that I could get some work done” → modifies why he left early
Then: “but I’ll be back soon” — this is another independent clause joined by “but”
So we have:
- Independent clause 1: I left early
- Dependent clause: so that I could get some work done
- Independent clause 2: I’ll be back soon
Joined by: subordinating (“so that”) and coordinating (“but”) → meets definition of Compound-Complex
Sentence Type: Compound-Complex
---
7. Crossing the street is dangerous if you don't look both ways before you cross.
“Crossing the street is dangerous” — independent
“if you don’t look both ways” — dependent (subordinating “if”)
“before you cross” — also dependent? Wait — “before” is subordinating too.
But note: “if you don’t look both ways before you cross” — this whole thing is one dependent clause modifying “dangerous”. Inside it, “before you cross” is embedded — but still, overall, only one main independent clause.
So: one independent + one or more dependent → still Complex Sentence
Sentence Type: Complex
---
8. If you don't want to study, you should stay home, but you may regret it.
Breakdown:
- “If you don’t want to study” — dependent (subordinating “if”)
- “you should stay home” — independent
- “but you may regret it” — independent (joined by coordinating “but”)
So: one dependent + two independent → uses both subordinating and coordinating conjunctions → Compound-Complex
Sentence Type: Compound-Complex
---
9. Every time I go to mall, I spend all of my money on things that I don't need.
“Every time I go to mall” — “every time” acts like a subordinating conjunction → dependent clause
“I spend all of my money...” — independent
“that I don’t need” — relative clause (also dependent, introduced by “that”) — but it’s inside the object of the main clause.
Still, only one independent clause → rest are dependent → Complex Sentence
Sentence Type: Complex
---
10. Mom said that I can go to the museum with you but I have to be home early.
“Mom said” — independent
“that I can go to the museum with you” — dependent (introduced by “that” — subordinating)
“but I have to be home early” — independent? Wait — how is it connected?
Actually, the structure is:
Mom said [that I can go... but I have to be home early]
The “but” is inside the noun clause — so “that I can go... but I have to be home early” is one big dependent clause (object of “said”), containing two parts joined by “but”.
So overall: one independent clause (“Mom said”) + one complex dependent clause → still only one independent clause → Complex Sentence
Wait — but let’s think: Is “I have to be home early” really dependent? In this case, yes — because it’s part of what Mom said. The whole thing after “that” is a single noun clause, even though it contains a contrast with “but”.
So: only one independent clause → Complex
Sentence Type: Complex
---
11. Modern Warfare is a fun game but no game is better than Ms. Pac-Man.
Two independent clauses:
- “Modern Warfare is a fun game”
- “no game is better than Ms. Pac-Man”
Joined by coordinating conjunction “but” → Compound Sentence
Sentence Type: Compound
---
12. Todd and Nick are eating chips and salsa on a park bench before dinner.
Subject: Todd and Nick
Predicate: are eating chips and salsa on a park bench
“before dinner” — prepositional phrase, not a clause
Only one clause → Simple Sentence
Sentence Type: Simple
---
Now, compiling final answers:
1. Complex
2. Compound
3. Complex
4. Simple
5. Simple
6. Compound-Complex
7. Complex
8. Compound-Complex
9. Complex
10. Complex
11. Compound
12. Simple
Final Answer:
1. Complex
2. Compound
3. Complex
4. Simple
5. Simple
6. Compound-Complex
7. Complex
8. Compound-Complex
9. Complex
10. Complex
11. Compound
12. Simple
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of sentence structure worksheet pdf.