Identify safe and unsafe actions in everyday scenarios.
A worksheet with images of various safety scenarios, including a person using a computer, a firefighter, a person with a dog, a police officer, a person entering a house, a car, a person with a stroller, and a person walking a dog, with checkboxes to mark safe or unsafe actions.
JPG
270×350
27.5 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #303969
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Wellness - Stranger Danger Worksheet worksheets library
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Wellness - Stranger Danger Worksheet worksheets library
Let’s go through each picture one by one and decide if the person is a safe stranger or an unsafe stranger.
We’ll use:
- ✔ for safe strangers (people you can trust or who help others)
- ✘ for unsafe strangers (people who might be dangerous or not trustworthy)
---
1. Girl at computer with books – This looks like a student or teacher in a classroom setting. Safe environment.
→ ✔
2. Person in firefighter gear with fire – Firefighters are helpers. They save people. Very safe.
→ ✔
3. Two kids talking to an adult in a field – The adult seems to be helping or teaching them. Looks safe.
→ ✔
4. Boy kicking soccer ball near a woman – Could be a coach or parent. No danger shown.
→ ✔
5. Man behind counter with money box – Looks like a bank teller or shop worker. Helping customers.
→ ✔
6. Police officer – Police officers protect people. Definitely safe.
→ ✔
7. Silhouette behind door – Can’t see who it is. Might be hiding or sneaking. Not safe to approach.
→ ✘
8. Woman driving car – Driving alone doesn’t make someone unsafe, but since we don’t know her, and she’s not in a public helper role, better to be cautious. But wait — actually, in this context, she’s just driving normally. However, compared to others, she’s not clearly a “helper” figure. Let’s think: Is she approaching a child? No. Is she in a uniform? No. So maybe unsafe? Actually, no — driving a car isn’t inherently unsafe. But in safety lessons, we teach kids not to get into cars with strangers. So even though she’s not doing anything bad, she’s still a stranger in a vehicle — which is a red flag for kids.
→ ✘
Wait — let’s reconsider. In many safety worksheets, adults in vehicles who aren’t clearly officials (like police) are marked as unsafe because kids shouldn’t talk to or get in cars with strangers. So yes — ✘
9. Cow and person in suit – Looks like a mascot or costume. Probably at a school event or parade. Fun and safe.
→ ✔
10. Person walking dog with kids nearby – Looks friendly. Walking a pet is usually safe.
→ ✔
11. Kids holding balloons, adult nearby – Looks like a party or event. Adult seems to be supervising. Safe.
→ ✔
12. Man pulling cart with animals – Looks like a farmer or worker. Doing normal work. Not threatening.
→ ✔
Wait — let’s double-check #7 and #8.
#7: Silhouette behind door — very suspicious. Could be someone hiding. Definitely unsafe.
#8: Woman in car — while not evil, in child safety education, any adult in a car who isn’t a known helper (like police, teacher) is considered potentially unsafe for kids to interact with. So ✘ is correct.
But hold on — looking again at #4: Boy kicking soccer ball near a woman. If that woman is a stranger, should she be marked unsafe? In real life, we teach kids not to talk to strangers even if they look nice. But in this worksheet, some pictures show people in helpful roles (firefighter, police, teacher). The woman with the soccer ball — is she a coach? Maybe. But there’s no clear indication. Hmm.
Actually, let’s look at the pattern:
Safe strangers are usually:
- In uniforms (police, firefighter)
- In professional settings (school, bank)
- Clearly helping or supervising (teacher, coach)
Unsafe strangers are:
- Hiding or sneaking (silhouette)
- In vehicles without clear purpose (car driver)
- Or situations where a child might be lured
So let’s re-evaluate all:
1. Girl at computer — likely student/teacher → ✔
2. Firefighter → ✔
3. Kids + adult in field — if adult is a teacher/coach → ✔
4. Boy + woman with soccer ball — if she’s a coach → ✔, but if random stranger → ✘. Since no uniform or clear role, maybe ✘? Wait — in most such worksheets, if it’s a group activity with supervision, it’s safe. I think we’ll keep it ✔.
Actually, let’s stick with initial assessment except for #7 and #8.
Final list:
Row 1:
✔ ✔ ✔ ✘
Row 2:
✔ ✔ ✘ ✘
Row 3:
✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Wait — that’s 12 images. Let me number them properly:
Top row (left to right):
1. Girl at computer → ✔
2. Firefighter → ✔
3. Kids with adult in field → ✔
4. Boy with soccer ball and woman → ✔ (assuming coach/parent)
Middle row:
5. Bank teller → ✔
6. Police officer → ✔
7. Silhouette behind door → ✘
8. Woman in car → ✘ (stranger in vehicle)
Bottom row:
9. Cow and suited person → ✔ (mascot/event)
10. Person with dog and kids → ✔ (friendly)
11. Kids with balloons and adult → ✔ (supervised)
12. Man with cart and animals → ✔ (worker)
Yes, that seems consistent.
So the answers are:
Row 1: ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘
Row 2: ✔ ✔ ✘
Row 3: ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
But wait — image 4: boy kicking ball near woman. If the woman is a stranger, should it be unsafe? In child safety, we say “don’t talk to strangers,” even if they’re nice. But in this worksheet, some “strangers” are marked safe because they’re in helper roles. The woman with the soccer ball — is she a stranger? Yes, unless she’s a known coach. Since no badge or uniform, perhaps it should be ✘?
This is tricky. Let’s think about the intent of the worksheet.
The goal is to teach kids to recognize people who are *supposed* to help them (police, firefighters, teachers) vs. people who might try to trick them.
In image 4, the woman is not in a uniform, not in a school, not clearly supervising — so maybe she’s a random adult. Therefore, ✘.
Similarly, image 3: kids talking to adult in field — if it’s a park, and adult is unknown, also ✘? But in image 3, the adult seems to be interacting positively, maybe teaching. It’s ambiguous.
To be consistent, let’s apply this rule:
If the person is in a uniform, or in a known safe place (school, bank), or clearly helping (firefighter, police), then ✔.
Otherwise, if they’re a random adult in public, even if nice, mark ✘ because kids shouldn’t talk to strangers.
So:
1. Girl at computer — if it’s a classroom, and she’s a student, then it’s safe environment → ✔
2. Firefighter — ✔
3. Adult in field with kids — no uniform, no clear role → ✘
4. Woman with soccer ball — no uniform, no clear role → ✘
5. Bank teller — in workplace, helping → ✔
6. Police — ✔
7. Silhouette — ✘
8. Woman in car — ✘
9. Mascot — in event, fun → ✔
10. Person with dog — could be stranger → ✘? But walking a dog is common. However, if it’s a stranger, kids shouldn’t approach. So ✘
11. Kids with balloons and adult — if adult is supervisor → ✔, but if stranger → ✘. Since it’s a group, likely supervised → ✔
12. Man with cart — worker, but stranger → ✘
This is getting too subjective.
Let’s look for standard answers in such worksheets.
Typically, in these exercises:
- Police, firefighter, teacher, doctor = ✔
- Random adults in public = ✘
- People in vehicles = ✘
- Hiding/sneaking = ✘
- Mascots or event staff = ✔ (if in context)
- Workers like farmers = often ✔ if not threatening
After research in my knowledge, common answers for similar worksheets:
Image 1: ✔ (school setting)
Image 2: ✔
Image 3: ✘ (random adult in field)
Image 4: ✘ (random adult with ball)
Image 5: ✔ (bank worker)
Image 6: ✔
Image 7: ✘
Image 8: ✘
Image 9: ✔ (mascot at event)
Image 10: ✘ (stranger with dog)
Image 11: ✔ (supervised group)
Image 12: ✘ (stranger with animals)
But image 11: if the adult is with kids holding balloons, likely a teacher or parent, so ✔.
Image 12: man with cart — if he’s working, not threatening, but still a stranger, so ✘.
I think the safest approach is:
Only mark ✔ for people who are clearly in helper roles or safe environments.
So:
1. ✔ (school)
2. ✔ (firefighter)
3. ✘ (unknown adult in field)
4. ✘ (unknown adult with ball)
5. ✔ (bank)
6. ✔ (police)
7. ✘ (hiding)
8. ✘ (car)
9. ✔ (mascot at event)
10. ✘ (stranger with dog)
11. ✔ (group with adult, likely supervised)
12. ✘ (stranger with animals)
But image 10: person walking dog — if it’s a park, and kids are there, it might be safe, but for a child, it’s still a stranger. So ✘.
Similarly, image 12: man with animals — could be a farmer, but stranger, so ✘.
Final decision:
Row 1: ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘
Row 2: ✔ ✔ ✘
Row 3: ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Let’s write it clearly:
1. Girl at computer: ✔
2. Firefighter: ✔
3. Kids with adult in field: ✘
4. Boy with soccer ball and woman: ✘
5. Bank teller: ✔
6. Police officer: ✔
7. Silhouette behind door: ✘
8. Woman in car: ✘
9. Cow and suited person: ✔
10. Person with dog: ✘
11. Kids with balloons and adult: ✔
12. Man with cart: ✘
Yes, this makes sense for child safety education.
So the final answer is the sequence of checkmarks and X's for each image in order.
Final Answer:
✔ ✔ ✘ ✘
✔ ✔ ✘ ✘
✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
We’ll use:
- ✔ for safe strangers (people you can trust or who help others)
- ✘ for unsafe strangers (people who might be dangerous or not trustworthy)
---
1. Girl at computer with books – This looks like a student or teacher in a classroom setting. Safe environment.
→ ✔
2. Person in firefighter gear with fire – Firefighters are helpers. They save people. Very safe.
→ ✔
3. Two kids talking to an adult in a field – The adult seems to be helping or teaching them. Looks safe.
→ ✔
4. Boy kicking soccer ball near a woman – Could be a coach or parent. No danger shown.
→ ✔
5. Man behind counter with money box – Looks like a bank teller or shop worker. Helping customers.
→ ✔
6. Police officer – Police officers protect people. Definitely safe.
→ ✔
7. Silhouette behind door – Can’t see who it is. Might be hiding or sneaking. Not safe to approach.
→ ✘
8. Woman driving car – Driving alone doesn’t make someone unsafe, but since we don’t know her, and she’s not in a public helper role, better to be cautious. But wait — actually, in this context, she’s just driving normally. However, compared to others, she’s not clearly a “helper” figure. Let’s think: Is she approaching a child? No. Is she in a uniform? No. So maybe unsafe? Actually, no — driving a car isn’t inherently unsafe. But in safety lessons, we teach kids not to get into cars with strangers. So even though she’s not doing anything bad, she’s still a stranger in a vehicle — which is a red flag for kids.
→ ✘
Wait — let’s reconsider. In many safety worksheets, adults in vehicles who aren’t clearly officials (like police) are marked as unsafe because kids shouldn’t talk to or get in cars with strangers. So yes — ✘
9. Cow and person in suit – Looks like a mascot or costume. Probably at a school event or parade. Fun and safe.
→ ✔
10. Person walking dog with kids nearby – Looks friendly. Walking a pet is usually safe.
→ ✔
11. Kids holding balloons, adult nearby – Looks like a party or event. Adult seems to be supervising. Safe.
→ ✔
12. Man pulling cart with animals – Looks like a farmer or worker. Doing normal work. Not threatening.
→ ✔
Wait — let’s double-check #7 and #8.
#7: Silhouette behind door — very suspicious. Could be someone hiding. Definitely unsafe.
#8: Woman in car — while not evil, in child safety education, any adult in a car who isn’t a known helper (like police, teacher) is considered potentially unsafe for kids to interact with. So ✘ is correct.
But hold on — looking again at #4: Boy kicking soccer ball near a woman. If that woman is a stranger, should she be marked unsafe? In real life, we teach kids not to talk to strangers even if they look nice. But in this worksheet, some pictures show people in helpful roles (firefighter, police, teacher). The woman with the soccer ball — is she a coach? Maybe. But there’s no clear indication. Hmm.
Actually, let’s look at the pattern:
Safe strangers are usually:
- In uniforms (police, firefighter)
- In professional settings (school, bank)
- Clearly helping or supervising (teacher, coach)
Unsafe strangers are:
- Hiding or sneaking (silhouette)
- In vehicles without clear purpose (car driver)
- Or situations where a child might be lured
So let’s re-evaluate all:
1. Girl at computer — likely student/teacher → ✔
2. Firefighter → ✔
3. Kids + adult in field — if adult is a teacher/coach → ✔
4. Boy + woman with soccer ball — if she’s a coach → ✔, but if random stranger → ✘. Since no uniform or clear role, maybe ✘? Wait — in most such worksheets, if it’s a group activity with supervision, it’s safe. I think we’ll keep it ✔.
Actually, let’s stick with initial assessment except for #7 and #8.
Final list:
Row 1:
✔ ✔ ✔ ✘
Row 2:
✔ ✔ ✘ ✘
Row 3:
✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Wait — that’s 12 images. Let me number them properly:
Top row (left to right):
1. Girl at computer → ✔
2. Firefighter → ✔
3. Kids with adult in field → ✔
4. Boy with soccer ball and woman → ✔ (assuming coach/parent)
Middle row:
5. Bank teller → ✔
6. Police officer → ✔
7. Silhouette behind door → ✘
8. Woman in car → ✘ (stranger in vehicle)
Bottom row:
9. Cow and suited person → ✔ (mascot/event)
10. Person with dog and kids → ✔ (friendly)
11. Kids with balloons and adult → ✔ (supervised)
12. Man with cart and animals → ✔ (worker)
Yes, that seems consistent.
So the answers are:
Row 1: ✔ ✔ ✔ ✘
Row 2: ✔ ✔ ✘
Row 3: ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
But wait — image 4: boy kicking ball near woman. If the woman is a stranger, should it be unsafe? In child safety, we say “don’t talk to strangers,” even if they’re nice. But in this worksheet, some “strangers” are marked safe because they’re in helper roles. The woman with the soccer ball — is she a stranger? Yes, unless she’s a known coach. Since no badge or uniform, perhaps it should be ✘?
This is tricky. Let’s think about the intent of the worksheet.
The goal is to teach kids to recognize people who are *supposed* to help them (police, firefighters, teachers) vs. people who might try to trick them.
In image 4, the woman is not in a uniform, not in a school, not clearly supervising — so maybe she’s a random adult. Therefore, ✘.
Similarly, image 3: kids talking to adult in field — if it’s a park, and adult is unknown, also ✘? But in image 3, the adult seems to be interacting positively, maybe teaching. It’s ambiguous.
To be consistent, let’s apply this rule:
If the person is in a uniform, or in a known safe place (school, bank), or clearly helping (firefighter, police), then ✔.
Otherwise, if they’re a random adult in public, even if nice, mark ✘ because kids shouldn’t talk to strangers.
So:
1. Girl at computer — if it’s a classroom, and she’s a student, then it’s safe environment → ✔
2. Firefighter — ✔
3. Adult in field with kids — no uniform, no clear role → ✘
4. Woman with soccer ball — no uniform, no clear role → ✘
5. Bank teller — in workplace, helping → ✔
6. Police — ✔
7. Silhouette — ✘
8. Woman in car — ✘
9. Mascot — in event, fun → ✔
10. Person with dog — could be stranger → ✘? But walking a dog is common. However, if it’s a stranger, kids shouldn’t approach. So ✘
11. Kids with balloons and adult — if adult is supervisor → ✔, but if stranger → ✘. Since it’s a group, likely supervised → ✔
12. Man with cart — worker, but stranger → ✘
This is getting too subjective.
Let’s look for standard answers in such worksheets.
Typically, in these exercises:
- Police, firefighter, teacher, doctor = ✔
- Random adults in public = ✘
- People in vehicles = ✘
- Hiding/sneaking = ✘
- Mascots or event staff = ✔ (if in context)
- Workers like farmers = often ✔ if not threatening
After research in my knowledge, common answers for similar worksheets:
Image 1: ✔ (school setting)
Image 2: ✔
Image 3: ✘ (random adult in field)
Image 4: ✘ (random adult with ball)
Image 5: ✔ (bank worker)
Image 6: ✔
Image 7: ✘
Image 8: ✘
Image 9: ✔ (mascot at event)
Image 10: ✘ (stranger with dog)
Image 11: ✔ (supervised group)
Image 12: ✘ (stranger with animals)
But image 11: if the adult is with kids holding balloons, likely a teacher or parent, so ✔.
Image 12: man with cart — if he’s working, not threatening, but still a stranger, so ✘.
I think the safest approach is:
Only mark ✔ for people who are clearly in helper roles or safe environments.
So:
1. ✔ (school)
2. ✔ (firefighter)
3. ✘ (unknown adult in field)
4. ✘ (unknown adult with ball)
5. ✔ (bank)
6. ✔ (police)
7. ✘ (hiding)
8. ✘ (car)
9. ✔ (mascot at event)
10. ✘ (stranger with dog)
11. ✔ (group with adult, likely supervised)
12. ✘ (stranger with animals)
But image 10: person walking dog — if it’s a park, and kids are there, it might be safe, but for a child, it’s still a stranger. So ✘.
Similarly, image 12: man with animals — could be a farmer, but stranger, so ✘.
Final decision:
Row 1: ✔ ✔ ✘ ✘
Row 2: ✔ ✔ ✘
Row 3: ✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Let’s write it clearly:
1. Girl at computer: ✔
2. Firefighter: ✔
3. Kids with adult in field: ✘
4. Boy with soccer ball and woman: ✘
5. Bank teller: ✔
6. Police officer: ✔
7. Silhouette behind door: ✘
8. Woman in car: ✘
9. Cow and suited person: ✔
10. Person with dog: ✘
11. Kids with balloons and adult: ✔
12. Man with cart: ✘
Yes, this makes sense for child safety education.
So the final answer is the sequence of checkmarks and X's for each image in order.
Final Answer:
✔ ✔ ✘ ✘
✔ ✔ ✘ ✘
✔ ✘ ✔ ✘
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of stranger danger worksheet.