Surface Area of Triangular Prisms worksheet with questions and a diagram.

Let’s solve each question step by step.

---

Question 1: Which of the following explains how to find the area of the base of the triangular prism?

First, look at the diagram for Question 1. The base is a triangle with:
- Base = 24 units
- Height = 10 units (shown with a right angle mark — this is the perpendicular height)

The formula for the area of a triangle is:

> Area = (base × height) ÷ 2

So we multiply 24 and 10, then divide by 2.

That matches option d: “Multiply 24 · 10, then divide by 2.”

Wait — let’s check the other options just in case.

a. Multiply 24 · 18 → That would be if both were sides of a rectangle or something — not correct for triangle area.

b. Multiply 18 · 26 → Those are slant lengths, not base and height.

c. Multiply 24 · 18, then divide by 2 → Again, 18 is not the height — it’s a side length, not perpendicular.

Only d uses the correct base (24) and correct height (10).

✔ So answer for Q1 is d.

---

Question 2: Which of the following is NOT a true statement about the triangular prism?

Look at the diagram for Question 2. It shows a triangular prism with:

- Triangular base has sides: 13, 15, and... wait, the third side isn’t labeled directly, but from the shape, it looks like the base triangle has sides 13, 15, and maybe 11? Wait — no, actually, looking again:

Actually, the triangular face has sides labeled: 13, 15, and the bottom edge is connected to an 8-unit edge on the rectangular face. But hold on — the base triangle must have three sides. Let me re-express:

From the diagram:

- One triangular face has sides: 13, 15, and the third side is shared with the rectangle that’s 8 units long? Actually, no — the 8 is the length of the prism (the distance between the two triangular bases).

Wait — standard labeling: In a triangular prism, there are two triangular bases and three rectangular faces.

In the diagram:

- The triangular base has sides: 13, 15, and... what’s the third side? Looking carefully — the triangle has sides 13, 15, and the side opposite the 6-unit height? Hmm.

Actually, the diagram shows a triangle with:

- Two sides: 13 and 15
- A height drawn inside the triangle: 6 units (perpendicular to the base of 15? Or to another side?)

Wait — the 6 is shown as the height of the triangle, dropping down to the side labeled 15? Let’s assume that.

So if the base of the triangle is 15, and height is 6, then area = (15 × 6)/2 = 45.

But let’s go through each option.

Option a: “The perimeter of the base is 32 units.”

What are the sides of the triangular base? From the diagram, the triangle has sides: 13, 15, and... the third side? Wait — actually, looking again, the triangle might have sides 13, 15, and 11? Because on the right side, there’s an 11 labeled on the rectangular face — which probably means the third side of the triangle is 11.

Yes! That makes sense. The triangular base has sides: 13, 15, and 11.

Perimeter = 13 + 15 + 11 = 39? Wait, 13+15=28, +11=39. But option says 32. That doesn’t match.

Wait — maybe I misread. Let me double-check the diagram description.

Actually, in many such diagrams, the numbers on the edges represent the lengths. So:

- The triangle has sides: 13, 15, and the side connecting them — which might be the one with the 6-unit height dropped to it.

Alternatively, perhaps the base of the triangle is 15, and the other two sides are 13 and... let’s calculate using Pythagoras if needed.

Wait — here’s a better approach: Look at option b: “The area of the base is 33 units².”

If the triangle has base 15 and height 6, area = (15×6)/2 = 45 — not 33.

But maybe the base is different.

Another possibility: Maybe the 6 is the height corresponding to base 11? Then area = (11×6)/2 = 33. Oh! That matches option b.

So if the base of the triangle is 11, and height is 6, then area = 33. That works.

Then the sides of the triangle would be: 13, 15, and 11? Let’s verify if that’s possible.

Check if a triangle with sides 11, 13, 15 can have height 6 to side 11.

Area = 33 (from above). Also, area = (base × height)/2 → so if base=11, height=6, area=33 — consistent.

Now, perimeter = 11 + 13 + 15 = 39. But option a says perimeter is 32. That’s not matching.

Wait — maybe the sides are different. Perhaps the triangle has sides 13, 15, and the third side is not 11.

Looking back at the diagram description: There’s an 8 labeled on one rectangular face, and 11 on another. Typically, in a triangular prism, the rectangular faces have dimensions equal to the sides of the triangle times the length of the prism.

Ah! Here’s the key: The 8 and 11 are likely the lengths of the rectangular faces, meaning they correspond to the sides of the triangle multiplied by the prism length? No — actually, in a prism, each rectangular face has one dimension equal to a side of the triangle, and the other dimension equal to the length of the prism (distance between triangles).

In the diagram, the 6 is the height of the triangle, and the 8 might be the length of the prism? But then why is 11 there?

Perhaps the triangular base has sides: let’s say the three sides are A, B, C, and the prism length is L.

From the diagram, we see:

- One rectangular face is 15 by ? — wait, the 15 is on the triangle, so one rectangle is 15 by L.
- Another rectangle is 13 by L.
- Third rectangle is ? by L — and we see 8 and 11 labeled on rectangles.

Actually, looking at common problems, often the numbers on the rectangles indicate the side of the triangle and the prism length.

But in this case, the 6 is clearly the height of the triangle, drawn inside it.

Assume the triangular base has:

- Base = 11 units (since area comes out to 33 with height 6: (11*6)/2=33)
- Other two sides: 13 and 15? But 11+13+15=39, not 32.

Option a says perimeter is 32. So maybe the sides are 13, 15, and 4? 13+15+4=32. But does that make sense with height 6?

If base is 4, height 6, area = (4*6)/2=12 — not 33.

If base is 11, area=33, perimeter=11+13+15=39≠32.

Perhaps the sides are 13, 15, and the third side is calculated.

Another idea: Maybe the 8 is the length of the prism, and the 11 is a side of the triangle.

Let’s list the options again:

a. Perimeter of base is 32 units.

b. Area of base is 33 units².

c. Height of prism is 6 units. — Wait, the 6 is labeled as the height of the triangle, not the prism. The prism height (length) is usually the distance between the two triangular bases. In the diagram, the 8 might be that.

d. Lateral surface area is 480 units².

Lateral surface area of a prism is perimeter of base times height of prism.

So if we can find which one is false.

Assume from diagram:

- The triangular base has sides: let's say from the labels, the triangle has sides 13, 15, and 11? But 13+15+11=39.

But option a says 32, so perhaps it's 13, 15, and 4? Unlikely.

Perhaps the 6 is not the height to side 11, but to another side.

Let’s calculate area using Heron's formula if we know all sides.

Suppose the triangle has sides 13, 15, and x.

But we don't know x.

Notice that in the diagram, there is a 6-unit height drawn, and it's perpendicular to a side. If that side is 11, then area = (11*6)/2 = 33 — matches option b.

Then the other two sides are 13 and 15. Is that possible? Check if a triangle with sides 11,13,15 can have height 6 to side 11.

The area is 33, as above. Now, is the height to side 11 really 6? Yes, by construction in the diagram.

So sides are 11,13,15. Perimeter = 11+13+15=39. But option a says 32. So a is false? But we need to find which is NOT true.

Option c: "The height of the prism is 6 units." — But the 6 is the height of the triangle, not the prism. The prism's height (length) is likely the 8 or 11? In the diagram, the 8 is labeled on a rectangular face, which probably means the length of the prism is 8 units.

Typically, the "height" of the prism refers to the distance between the two bases, which is the length of the rectangular faces.

So if the rectangular face has dimensions say 15 by 8, then the prism height is 8.

But option c says "the height of the prism is 6 units" — but 6 is the height of the triangle, not the prism. So this might be false.

Let's clarify terminology:

- For a prism, the "height" usually means the perpendicular distance between the two bases, i.e., the length of the lateral edges.

- The "height of the base" is the height of the triangular face.

In the diagram, the 6 is labeled as the height of the triangle (with a right angle mark), so it's the height of the base, not the height of the prism.

The prism's height (length) is likely 8, as it's labeled on the rectangular face.

So option c says "The height of the prism is 6 units" — this is incorrect; it should be 8 or whatever the length is.

But let's see what the diagram shows. The user's image description says: "6" is next to the triangle with a bracket, indicating it's the height of the triangle. And "8" is on one of the rectangular faces, likely the length of the prism.

Also, "11" is on another rectangular face.

So probably, the triangular base has sides corresponding to the widths of the rectangular faces. So if there are rectangular faces of width 13, 15, and 11, then the triangle has sides 13,15,11.

Perimeter = 13+15+11=39.

Area: if height to side 11 is 6, area= (11*6)/2=33 — matches b.

Height of prism: the length of the prism is the dimension along which the triangle is extruded. In the diagram, the 8 is likely that length, because it's labeled on a rectangular face that is not associated with the triangle's side directly? Wait, typically, each rectangular face has one side equal to a side of the triangle, and the other side equal to the prism length.

So if a rectangular face is labeled 8, and it's attached to a side of the triangle, then the prism length is 8.

For example, if the rectangle has dimensions 15 by 8, then 15 is the side of the triangle, 8 is the prism length.

Similarly, another rectangle might be 13 by 8, and the third 11 by 8.

But in the diagram, we see 8 and 11 labeled — perhaps 11 is a side of the triangle, and 8 is the prism length.

So prism height (length) is 8 units.

Therefore, option c: "The height of the prism is 6 units" — this is false, because 6 is the height of the triangle, not the prism.

Now check d: "The lateral surface area is 480 units²."

Lateral surface area = perimeter of base × height of prism.

Perimeter of base = 13 + 15 + 11 = 39 units.

Height of prism = 8 units.

So lateral SA = 39 × 8 = 312 units².

But option d says 480, which is not 312. So d is also false?

But the question asks for which is NOT true — implying only one is false.

This is confusing.

Perhaps the sides are different.

Another possibility: Maybe the triangular base has sides 13, 15, and the third side is not 11. Perhaps the 11 is the prism length.

Let's read the diagram description again: "6" is the height of the triangle, "8" and "11" are on the rectangular faces.

Perhaps the rectangular faces have dimensions:

- One is 15 by 8

- One is 13 by 8

- One is ? by 8 — but we see 11, so perhaps the third side is 11, and the prism length is 8.

Same as before.

Perimeter 39, lateral SA 39*8=312.

But option d says 480, which is larger.

480 divided by 8 is 60, so if perimeter were 60, but 13+15+11=39.

Unless the prism length is not 8.

Perhaps the 8 is not the prism length. Let's think differently.

In some diagrams, the number on the rectangular face might be the area or something, but unlikely.

Another idea: Perhaps the "8" is the length of the prism, and the "11" is a side, but the triangle has sides 13, 15, and let's say x, and the height 6 is to side x.

Then area = (x * 6)/2 = 3x.

Option b says area is 33, so 3x=33, x=11. So side is 11.

Sides 13,15,11, perimeter 39.

Prism height: if the rectangular face corresponding to side 11 has dimension 11 by h, and it's labeled 8, then h=8? Or if it's labeled with the area, but usually it's the side lengths.

Perhaps the 8 is the prism height, and the 11 is the side, so lateral area for that face is 11*8=88, similarly 13*8=104, 15*8=120, total lateral SA = 88+104+120=312.

Still 312.

But option d says 480, which is not 312.

Option a says perimeter is 32, but it's 39.

Option c says height of prism is 6, but it's 8.

So multiple seem false, but the question implies only one is not true.

Perhaps I misidentified the sides.

Let's look at the first part of the diagram for Q2: it shows a triangle with sides 13, 15, and the base is not labeled, but there's a height of 6 drawn to it. And then the prism extends with length 8, and on the other end, there's a rectangle with 11.

Perhaps the 11 is not a side of the triangle, but the length of the prism? But then why is 8 there?

Another common configuration: sometimes the number on the rectangular face is the length of the prism, and the side of the triangle is given separately.

But in this case, for the triangle, we have sides 13 and 15, and the included angle or something.

Perhaps the 6 is the height, and it's to the side of length 11, but 11 is not a side — wait.

Let's calculate the area using the given height.

Suppose the base of the triangle is b, height h=6, area = (b*6)/2 = 3b.

Option b says area is 33, so 3b=33, b=11. So the base is 11.

Then the other two sides are 13 and 15. Is that possible? Let's check if a triangle with sides 11,13,15 can have height 6 to side 11.

The area is 33, as above. Now, the height to side 11 is indeed 6, by definition.

Now, the perimeter is 11+13+15=39.

But option a says 32, so a is false.

Option c: "The height of the prism is 6 units." — but the 6 is the height of the triangle, not the prism. The prism's height is the length, which is likely 8, as labeled on the rectangular face.

So c is also false.

Option d: lateral surface area = perimeter * prism height = 39 * 8 = 312, but d says 480, so d is false.

This is a problem.

Perhaps the prism height is not 8. Let's see what 480 / 39 is — approximately 12.3, not nice.

480 / 16 = 30, etc.

Another idea: perhaps the "8" is not the prism height, but a side. Let's swap.

Suppose the triangular base has sides 13, 15, and 8. Then perimeter = 13+15+8=36.

Area: if height to side 8 is 6, area = (8*6)/2 = 24, but option b says 33, not match.

If height to side 15 is 6, area = (15*6)/2 = 45, not 33.

If height to side 13 is 6, area = (13*6)/2 = 39, not 33.

None give 33 except when base is 11.

Perhaps the 11 is the prism height.

Let me try that.

Assume the prism height (length) is 11 units.

Then lateral surface area = perimeter * 11.

If perimeter is 32 (option a), then lateral SA = 32*11 = 352, not 480.

If perimeter is 39, 39*11=429, not 480.

480 / 11 ≈ 43.6, not integer.

480 / 8 = 60, so if perimeter is 60, but 13+15+11=39.

Unless the sides are different.

Perhaps the triangle has sides 13, 15, and the third side is 12 or something.

Let's calculate what perimeter would give lateral SA 480 with prism height 8: 480 / 8 = 60, so perimeter 60.

With height 6 for area 33, base 11, so sides 11,13,15 sum 39, not 60.

This is not working.

Perhaps the "6" is the height of the prism, not the triangle.

Let's read the diagram description: "6" is shown with a bracket next to the triangle, and it's likely the height of the triangle, as it's inside the triangle with a right angle.

But in some contexts, it might be mislabeled.

Perhaps for option c, "the height of the prism is 6 units" is intended to be true, but that doesn't make sense.

Let's look at option d: "The lateral surface area is 480 units²."

How could that be? If the prism height is 8, and perimeter is 60, but 13+15+32=60? Not likely.

Another thought: perhaps the 8 and 11 are not related to the prism length, but are sides.

Let's consider that the triangular base has sides 13, 15, and 8. Then perimeter = 13+15+8=36.

Area: if height to side 8 is 6, area = 24, not 33.

If the height 6 is to side 15, area = 45.

Not 33.

Perhaps the area is calculated differently.

Or perhaps the 33 is wrong.

Let's calculate the area using Heron's formula for sides 13,15,11.

Semi-perimeter s = (13+15+11)/2 = 39/2 = 19.5

Area = sqrt[s(s-a)(s-b)(s-c)] = sqrt[19.5(19.5-15)(19.5-13)(19.5-11)] = sqrt[19.5 * 4.5 * 6.5 * 8.5]

Calculate:

19.5 * 4.5 = 87.75

6.5 * 8.5 = 55.25

Then 87.75 * 55.25 — this is messy, and likely not 33.

87.75 * 55.25 = let's approximate: 88*55 = 4840, sqrt(4840) ≈ 69.5, not 33.

So for sides 13,15,11, area is not 33.

But earlier, if base 11, height 6, area=33, but that assumes the height is to side 11, which may not be accurate if the triangle is not configured that way.

In the diagram, the height 6 is drawn to the side that is labeled 15? Let's assume that.

Suppose the base of the triangle is 15, height 6, then area = (15*6)/2 = 45.

Then option b says 33, which is false.

Perimeter: if sides are 13,15, and say x.

If base 15, height 6, then the foot of the perpendicular divides the base into segments.

Let me denote the triangle with base BC = 15, height AD = 6, D on BC.

Then AB = 13, AC = ? or vice versa.

Suppose AB = 13, then in triangle ABD, BD = sqrt(AB^2 - AD^2) = sqrt(169 - 36) = sqrt(133) ≈ 11.53

Then DC = 15 - 11.53 = 3.47, then AC = sqrt(AD^2 + DC^2) = sqrt(36 + 12.04) = sqrt(48.04) ≈ 6.93, not 11 or 8.

Not matching.

If AB = 13, AC = 11, then BD = sqrt(13^2 - 6^2) = sqrt(169-36) = sqrt(133) ≈ 11.53

DC = sqrt(11^2 - 6^2) = sqrt(121-36) = sqrt(85) ≈ 9.22

Then BC = BD + DC = 11.53 + 9.22 = 20.75, not 15.

So not consistent.

Perhaps the height 6 is to the side of length 11, and the other sides are 13 and 15, but as above, the area would be 33, but the actual area from Heron's formula is not 33, so the height is not 6 for that base.

This is complicated.

Perhaps in the diagram, the 6 is the height, and it's given, so we take area = (base * 6)/2, and base is the side it's perpendicular to.

In the diagram, the 6 is likely perpendicular to the side labeled 15, because it's drawn to that side.

Assume that.

So base = 15, height = 6, area = (15*6)/2 = 45.

Then option b says 33, which is false.

Perimeter: if the other two sides are 13 and 11, then perimeter = 15+13+11=39, option a says 32, false.

But perhaps the sides are 13, 15, and the third side is 4, but 13+15+4=32, and if base 15, height 6, area=45, not 33.

Option c: height of prism is 6 — but 6 is the height of the triangle, so if they mean the prism height is 6, but in the diagram, there's an 8, so probably not.

Option d: lateral SA = perimeter * prism height.

If perimeter is 32, prism height 8, then 32*8=256, not 480.

If prism height is 15, 32*15=480! Oh!

So if the prism height is 15, and perimeter is 32, then lateral SA = 32*15 = 480.

And option a says perimeter is 32, option d says lateral SA is 480, which would be consistent if prism height is 15.

But is the prism height 15? In the diagram, 15 is labeled on the triangle, so it's a side of the base, not the prism height.

Unless the 15 is the length of the prism.

Let's rethink.

Perhaps the number 15 is the length of the prism, not a side of the triangle.

In the diagram, the 15 is on the triangular face, so it should be a side of the triangle.

But let's look at the user's description: "15" is on the triangle, "6" is the height, "8" and "11" on rectangles.

Perhaps for the prism, the "height" in option c refers to the length, and it's 8 or 11.

Let's assume that the triangular base has sides 13, 11, and the third side is 8, but 13+11+8=32, which matches option a.

Then perimeter = 32.

Area: if height to side 8 is 6, area = (8*6)/2 = 24, but option b says 33, not match.

If height to side 13 is 6, area = (13*6)/2 = 39, not 33.

If height to side 11 is 6, area = 33, yes! So if the base is 11, height 6, area=33.

Then the sides are 13, 8, and 11? 13+8+11=32, perfect for option a.

Is that possible? Sides 8,11,13.

Check if a triangle with sides 8,11,13 can have height 6 to side 11.

Area = (11*6)/2 = 33.

Now, verify with Heron's formula.

s = (8+11+13)/2 = 32/2 = 16

Area = sqrt[16(16-8)(16-11)(16-13)] = sqrt[16*8*5*3] = sqrt[1920] = sqrt[64*30] = 8sqrt(30) ≈ 8*5.477 = 43.816, not 33.

Oh, not 33.

So not consistent.

Perhaps the height is not 6 for side 11.

Maybe the 6 is the height, and it's given, so we accept area = 33 for base 11, and ignore the side lengths for now.

But for perimeter, if sides are 13,15,11, sum 39, not 32.

Perhaps the 15 is not a side, but the prism length.

Let's try this: suppose the triangular base has sides 13, 11, and 8. Perimeter 32, matches a.

Area: if we take height 6 to side 11, area=33, matches b.

Even though Heron's formula gives different, perhaps in the diagram, it's assumed.

Then the prism height: the length of the prism is the dimension not in the base. In the diagram, there's a 15 labeled, which might be the prism height.

Because 15 is on the triangle, but perhaps it's a mistake, or perhaps it's the length.

In many problems, the number on the edge between the two triangles is the prism height.

In the diagram, the 15 might be the length of the prism.

Then option c: "The height of the prism is 6 units" — false, because it's 15.

Option d: lateral surface area = perimeter * prism height = 32 * 15 = 480, matches d.

So a, b, d are true, c is false.

And c says "the height of the prism is 6 units", but 6 is the height of the triangle, not the prism.

So c is not true.

Whereas a: perimeter 32 (assumed from sides 8,11,13), b: area 33 (from base 11, height 6), d: lateral SA 32*15=480, and c: height of prism is 6, but it's 15, so false.

Perfect.

So the not true statement is c.

To confirm, in the diagram, the 15 is likely the length of the prism, even though it's labeled on the triangle, perhaps it's a common labeling error or convention.

Perhaps the 15 is the side, but in this context, for the sake of the problem, we go with c being false.

So for Question 2, the answer is c.

Summary:

Q1: d

Q2: c

Final Answer:
1. d
2. c