Free. Exclusive. Just for you.
Four unique services that make learning easier, faster, and smarter - only on our website.

Probability worksheet with problems on experimental and theoretical probability involving card selection and eye color distribution.

A math worksheet titled "Probability Worksheet 4: Experimental and Theoretical Probability" featuring exercises on probability using a standard deck of cards and eye color survey data.

A math worksheet titled "Probability Worksheet 4: Experimental and Theoretical Probability" featuring exercises on probability using a standard deck of cards and eye color survey data.

JPG 495×640 68.5 KB Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #588010
Show Answer Key & Explanations Step-by-step solution for: Probability Worksheet 4
Let’s go step by step through each question. We’ll use the data from Amanda’s card experiment and Dale’s eye color survey to find probabilities.

---

Amanda’s Card Experiment:

She drew cards 30 times total (7 Diamonds + 9 Hearts + 11 Spades + 3 Clubs = 30).

---

Question 1: Experimental probability of selecting a heart?

Experimental probability = (number of times heart was picked) ÷ (total number of trials)

→ 9 hearts out of 30 draws → 9/30

We can simplify that: divide numerator and denominator by 3 → 3/10

Answer: 3/10

---

Question 2: Theoretical probability of selecting a heart?

In a standard deck, there are 52 cards, and 13 of them are hearts.

So theoretical probability = 13/52

Simplify: divide top and bottom by 13 → 1/4

Answer: 1/4

---

Question 3: Experimental probability of diamond OR spade?

Diamonds: 7
Spades: 11
Total for either: 7 + 11 = 18
Total trials: 30

→ 18/30

Simplify: divide by 6 → 3/5

Answer: 3/5

---

Question 4: Theoretical probability of diamond OR spade?

Diamonds: 13 cards
Spades: 13 cards
Total favorable: 13 + 13 = 26
Total cards: 52

→ 26/52 = 1/2

Answer: 1/2

---

Question 5: Compare results and describe findings.

Experimental vs Theoretical:

- Heart: Exp = 3/10 (0.3), Theo = 1/4 (0.25) → close but not same
- Diamond or Spade: Exp = 3/5 (0.6), Theo = 1/2 (0.5) → also close

They’re not exactly the same — which is normal in experiments because you’re only doing 30 tries. But they’re within about 10% of each other, so it’s reasonable.

Answer: The experimental and theoretical probabilities are not the same, but they are close — within about 10% of each other. This makes sense because with more trials, experimental probability usually gets closer to theoretical.

---

Dale’s Eye Color Survey:

Total students surveyed: 12 (Blue) + 58 (Brown) + 2 (Green) + 8 (Hazel) = 80

---

Question 6a: Experimental probability distribution for each eye color

P(blue) = 12/80 → simplify: divide by 4 → 3/20

P(brown) = 58/80 → divide by 2 → 29/40

P(green) = 2/80 → divide by 2 → 1/40

P(hazel) = 8/80 → divide by 8 → 1/10

Answers:
- P(blue) = 3/20
- P(brown) = 29/40
- P(green) = 1/40
- P(hazel) = 1/10

---

Question 6b: Probability student has blue OR green eyes?

Add P(blue) + P(green) = 12/80 + 2/80 = 14/80

Simplify: divide by 2 → 7/40

Answer: 7/40

---

Question 6c: Probability student does NOT have brown OR hazel eyes?

That means they have BLUE or GREEN.

Same as above! Because “not brown or hazel” = blue or green.

So again: 12 + 2 = 14 → 14/80 = 7/40

Wait — let me double-check.

“Not have brown or hazel” → exclude brown (58) and hazel (8) → left with blue (12) + green (2) = 14 → yes, 14/80 = 7/40

But wait — the handwritten answer says 7/8? That must be wrong.

Hold on — maybe I misread.

Original question: “does not have brown or hazel eyes?”

Yes — so we want students who have NEITHER brown NOR hazel → so only blue or green → 12 + 2 = 14 → 14/80 = 7/40.

But the handwritten note says: 80 - 10 = 70 → 70/80 = 7/8.

Ah — that’s if they meant “does not have brown AND does not have hazel” — but that’s the same thing.

Wait — no. If you subtract brown AND hazel, you get 58 + 8 = 66 → 80 - 66 = 14 → still 14/80.

Unless... did they mean “does not have (brown or hazel)” — which is correct — 14/80.

But 70/80 would be if they subtracted only 10 — which doesn’t make sense.

Wait — looking back at the image: the handwritten part says “80 - 10 = 70” — where does 10 come from?

Maybe they added blue and green? 12 + 2 = 14 — not 10.

This seems like an error in the handwritten work.

Actually — perhaps they meant “does not have brown” — then it would be 80 - 58 = 22 → 22/80 = 11/40.

Or “does not have hazel” — 80 - 8 = 72 → 72/80 = 9/10.

But the question says: “does not have brown or hazel eyes”

In math, “or” in this context usually means union — so excluding both.

So correct answer should be 14/80 = 7/40.

But let’s check the original problem again.

Looking at the image: Question 6c says:

> c. Based on the survey, what is the experimental probability that a student in Dale’s class does not have brown or hazel eyes?

And the handwritten answer says: 80 - 10 = 70 → 70/80 = 7/8.

Where does 10 come from? Maybe they thought “brown or hazel” is 58 + 8 = 66, but wrote 10 by mistake? Or maybe they meant something else.

Wait — another interpretation: sometimes people say “does not have brown or hazel” meaning “has neither”, which is correct — 14/80.

But 7/8 is 70/80 — which would be if only 10 students had brown or hazel — but that’s not true.

I think the handwritten answer is incorrect.

Let me recalculate:

Total students: 80

Students with brown OR hazel: 58 + 8 = 66

Students without brown OR hazel: 80 - 66 = 14

Probability: 14/80 = 7/40

Correct Answer: 7/40

*(Note: The handwritten answer of 7/8 appears to be a calculation error.)*

---

Question 6d: If distribution is similar, how many of 360 students expected to have brown eyes?

From survey: P(brown) = 58/80

Apply to 360 students: (58/80) × 360

First, simplify 58/80 = 29/40

Now: (29/40) × 360

= 29 × (360 ÷ 40) = 29 × 9 = 261

Answer: 261 students

---

Final Answers Summary:

1. 3/10
2. 1/4
3. 3/5
4. 1/2
5. The experimental and theoretical probabilities are not the same, but they are close — within about 10% of each other. This makes sense because with more trials, experimental probability usually gets closer to theoretical.
6a. P(blue)=3/20, P(brown)=29/40, P(green)=1/40, P(hazel)=1/10
6b. 7/40
6c. 7/40 *(corrected from handwritten 7/8)*
6d. 261 students

──────────────────────────────────────

Final Answer:
1. \(\frac{3}{10}\)
2. \(\frac{1}{4}\)
3. \(\frac{3}{5}\)
4. \(\frac{1}{2}\)
5. The experimental and theoretical probabilities are not the same, but they are close — within about 10% of each other. This makes sense because with more trials, experimental probability usually gets closer to theoretical.
6a. P(blue) = \(\frac{3}{20}\), P(brown) = \(\frac{29}{40}\), P(green) = \(\frac{1}{40}\), P(hazel) = \(\frac{1}{10}\)
6b. \(\frac{7}{40}\)
6c. \(\frac{7}{40}\)
6d. 261
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of theoretical vs experimental probability worksheet.
Print Download

How to use

Click Print to open a print-ready version directly in your browser, or use Download to save the file to your device. The ⭐ Answer button generates an AI answer key instantly - useful for teachers who need a quick reference. Need a different version? Our AI Worksheet Generator lets you create a custom worksheet on any topic in seconds.

(view all theoretical vs experimental probability worksheet)

Probability Worksheet 4 - Experimental vs. Theoretical - Ellie ...
Probability Multiple Choice interactive worksheet | Live Worksheets
50+ experimental probability worksheets for 12th Grade on Quizizz ...
Quiz & Worksheet - Theoretical vs. Experimental Probability ...
Calculate Theoretical Probability Worksheets [PDF] (7.SP.C.7.A ...
50+ experimental probability worksheets for 9th Grade on Quizizz ...
Theoretical and Experimental Probability Simulation ...
Worksheet 9 2 Math 7 Answer Key - Fill Online, Printable, Fillable ...
Countdown Challenge: Experimental Probability Worksheet for 7th ...
Comparing Experimental and Theoretical Probability | Math | Study.com