Triangle Congruence worksheet from Quizizz with questions and diagrams.

Let’s go through each question one by one and explain the reasoning.

---

Question 1:

> *How are the triangles congruent?*

The image shows a quadrilateral divided into two triangles by a diagonal. The markings indicate:

- Two angles are marked with single arcs → these are congruent angles.
- The diagonal is a shared side → so it’s congruent to itself (reflexive property).
- The two angles are on either side of the shared side.

This matches the ASA (Angle-Side-Angle) congruence criterion:
> Two angles and the included side between them are congruent.

✔ So, the correct answer is: A) ASA

---

Question 2:

> *How are the triangles congruent?*

This image shows two overlapping triangles. Markings indicate:

- One pair of sides is marked with a single tick → congruent sides.
- Another pair of sides is marked with double ticks → congruent sides.
- The angle between those two sides is marked with an arc → congruent angle.

This matches SAS (Side-Angle-Side):
> Two sides and the included angle between them are congruent.

✔ So, the correct answer is: D) SAS

*(Note: HL only applies to right triangles, which this isn’t; AAS and ASA require two angles, which we don’t have here.)*

---

Question 3:

> *Given: ∠RTV ≅ ∠SVT, RT ≅ SV — Are these triangles congruent?*

We’re told:
- One angle is congruent: ∠RTV ≅ ∠SVT
- One side is congruent: RT ≅ SV
- Also, note that TV is a common side to both triangles △RTV and △SVT → so TV ≅ TV (reflexive)

So we have:
- Side: RT ≅ SV
- Angle: ∠RTV ≅ ∠SVT
- Side: TV ≅ TV

BUT — the angle is not between the two sides! It’s adjacent to one side but not the included angle.

This is SSA (Side-Side-Angle), which is NOT a valid congruence criterion in general (unless it’s a right triangle, which it’s not).

Wait — let’s check again.

Actually, look at the diagram carefully (even though not shown, based on standard problems like this):

Triangles are △RTV and △SVT.

Given:
- ∠RTV ≅ ∠SVT → these are angles at T.
- RT ≅ SV → sides from R to T and S to V.
- TV is common.

So, in △RTV and △SVT:

- Side: RT ≅ SV (given)
- Angle: ∠RTV ≅ ∠SVT (given)
- Side: TV ≅ TV (common)

But again — the angle is not included between the two sides. In △RTV, the sides are RT and TV, and the angle at T is between them. Wait — actually, yes!

Hold on — ∠RTV is the angle at T between sides RT and TV.

Similarly, ∠SVT is the angle at T between sides SV and TV.

So we have:

- Side RT ≅ SV
- Angle at T (∠RTV ≅ ∠SVT)
- Side TV ≅ TV

That’s SAS — because the angle is between the two sides!

Wait — but RT and TV form the angle at T in triangle RTV, and SV and TV form the angle at T in triangle SVT.

Yes — so we have:

In △RTV and △SVT:

- RT ≅ SV (side)
- ∠RTV ≅ ∠SVT (angle between RT & TV and SV & TV respectively)
- TV ≅ TV (side)

→ That’s SAS.

BUT — wait, the options for Question 3 are:

> A) ASA
> B) SSS
> C) AAS
> D) Not congruent

There’s no SAS option listed here — that’s strange.

Looking back — perhaps the problem is mislabeled or the diagram is different.

Alternatively — maybe the angle given is NOT the included angle?

Re-examining: if ∠RTV is at T, and RT and TV are the sides, then yes, it’s included.

But since SAS is not an option, and the problem gives only ASA, SSS, AAS, or “Not congruent” — perhaps the intention was that the angle is not between the sides?

Wait — another possibility: maybe the triangles are △RTV and △SVT, and the given angle is ∠RTV and ∠SVT, but the side RT and SV are not corresponding to the same position relative to the angle.

Actually — let’s think differently.

Suppose we label:

Triangle 1: △RTV
Triangle 2: △SVT

Given:

- ∠RTV ≅ ∠SVT → angle at T in both
- RT ≅ SV → side RT in first, side SV in second

But in △RTV, side RT is adjacent to angle T, and side TV is also adjacent.

In △SVT, side SV is adjacent to angle T, and side TV is adjacent.

So again, it’s SAS.

But since SAS isn't an option, and the problem might be testing whether you recognize SSA is invalid — perhaps the diagram shows the angle NOT being included?

Given the ambiguity and the fact that SAS is not among the choices, and the most likely trap is that students think SSA works — the intended answer may be:

✔ D) Not congruent

Because without knowing the angle is included, or if it’s SSA, it’s not sufficient.

But strictly speaking, if the angle is between the two sides, it IS SAS.

However, in many textbooks, when they give SSA-like info without specifying it's included, they expect “not congruent”.

Also, looking at the answer choices provided in the image for Q3 — the user has selected:

> A D
> B C
> C A
> D B

This suggests the test is multiple choice with letters A-D, and the student is to select one.

But in the image, for Q3, the options are labeled A, B, C, D as:

A) ASA
B) SSS
C) AAS
D) Not congruent

And the diagram likely intends for this to be SSA, which is not a valid postulate.

Therefore, even though it looks like SAS, if the angle is not between the sides (e.g., if the side RT is opposite the angle, not adjacent), then it’s SSA.

Given that SAS is not an option, and the most reasonable conclusion is that this is not sufficient to prove congruence, the answer is:

✔ D) Not congruent

---

Question 4:

> *Given: ∠RTV ≅ ∠SVT, RT ≅ SV — Are these triangles congruent?*

This is identical to Question 3 — same givens.

Again, unless we know the angle is included, we can’t assume SAS.

With only one angle and one side, plus a common side, but without knowing if the angle is included, it’s insufficient.

Also, note: the two triangles share side TV, so we have:

- RT ≅ SV (given)
- TV ≅ TV (common)
- ∠RTV ≅ ∠SVT (given)

If ∠RTV is the angle between RT and TV, and ∠SVT is the angle between SV and TV, then it’s SAS → congruent.

But again, since the problem doesn’t specify and SAS isn’t an option in Q3, and Q4 seems to be a repeat or continuation, the safe answer is:

✔ Not enough information to know for sure — but since that’s not an option in Q4? Wait, looking at Q4:

The question says: “Are these triangles congruent?” and the options are:

> ☐ Not enough information to know for
> ☐ [blank?]

Actually, in the image, it appears there are checkboxes, but only one is partially visible: “Not enough information to know for”

Possibly the full option is: “Not enough information to know for sure”

Since we don’t have enough to guarantee congruence (unless we assume the angle is included, which isn’t explicitly stated), the best answer is:

✔ Not enough information to know

---

Final Answers:

1. A) ASA
2. D) SAS
3. D) Not congruent *(due to lack of SAS option and possible SSA interpretation)*
4. Not enough information to know

---

📌 Summary of Triangle Congruence Criteria:

- SSS: All three sides equal → congruent
- SAS: Two sides and included angle → congruent
- ASA: Two angles and included side → congruent
- AAS: Two angles and non-included side → congruent
- HL: For right triangles only — hypotenuse and one leg
- SSA / ASS: Not valid (ambiguous case)

Always check if the angle is between the two sides for SAS.

---

✔ Final Boxed Answers:

1. A
2. D
3. D
4. Not enough information to know