Similar Triangles Worksheet - Identify and complete similarity statements for given triangle pairs.

Let's solve each problem on the Similar Triangles Worksheet step by step. We will determine whether each pair of triangles is similar, and if so, write the correct similarity statement (e.g., ΔABC ~ ΔDEF). We'll use the following criteria for triangle similarity:

- SSS (Side-Side-Side): All three pairs of corresponding sides are proportional.
- SAS (Side-Angle-Side): Two pairs of corresponding sides are proportional and the included angles are congruent.
- AA (Angle-Angle): Two pairs of corresponding angles are congruent.

---

1. Triangle PQR and Triangle ABC

Given:
- ΔPQR: PQ = 72, QR = 36, PR = 84
- ΔABC: AB = 6, BC = 12, AC = 14

Check ratios:
- PQ / AB = 72 / 6 = 12
- QR / BC = 36 / 12 = 3
- PR / AC = 84 / 14 = 6

Ratios are not equal → Not similar

✔ Answer: Not similar

---

2. Triangle XYZ and Triangle EFQ

Given:
- ΔXYZ: XY = 6, YZ = 5, XZ = 8
- ΔEFQ: EF = 36, FQ = 30, EQ = 48

Check ratios:
- XY / EF = 6 / 36 = 1/6
- YZ / FQ = 5 / 30 = 1/6
- XZ / EQ = 8 / 48 = 1/6

All ratios are equal → SSS Similarity

So, ΔXYZ ~ ΔEFQ

But we need to match the corresponding vertices based on side ratios.

Since:
- XY corresponds to EF (both shortest legs)
- YZ corresponds to FQ
- XZ corresponds to EQ

So, ΔXYZ ~ ΔEFQ

✔ Answer: ΔXYZ ~ ΔEFQ

---

3. Triangle KLM and Triangle NPQ

Given:
- ΔKLM: KL = 3, LM = 3, KM = 3 → equilateral
- ΔNPQ: NP = 27, PQ = 27, NQ = 27 → equilateral

All sides equal → both equilateral → all angles = 60° → AAA (or SSS)

So, they are similar.

Now, order the vertices:
- K → N (both top vertices)
- L → P (left base)
- M → Q (right base)

So, ΔKLM ~ ΔNPQ

✔ Answer: ΔKLM ~ ΔNPQ

---

4. Triangle WQP and Triangle SML

We have markings:
- Right angles at W and S
- Two tick marks on WQ and SM → WQ ≅ SM
- One tick mark on WP and SL → WP ≅ SL
- Arcs show ∠W = ∠S (both right), and ∠P = ∠L

Wait — let’s look carefully:

In triangle WQP:
- Right angle at W
- Tick marks: WQ has two ticks, WP has one tick
- Angle at P is marked with a single arc

In triangle SML:
- Right angle at S
- SM has two ticks, SL has one tick
- Angle at L has same arc as angle at P

So:
- ∠W = ∠S = 90°
- ∠P = ∠L (same arc)
- So by AA similarity: ΔWQP ~ ΔSML

Now check correspondence:
- W → S (right angles)
- Q → M (side with two ticks)
- P → L (angle with same arc)

So, ΔWQP ~ ΔSML

✔ Answer: ΔWQP ~ ΔSML

---

5. Triangle EFG and Triangle PRO

Markings:
- In ΔEFG: EF has two ticks, EG has one tick, angle at E is marked
- In ΔPRO: PR has two ticks, PO has one tick, angle at P is marked

Also, angle at E and angle at P are marked with same arc → ∠E = ∠P

Sides:
- EF = PR (two ticks)
- EG = PO (one tick)
- Included angle: ∠E = ∠P

So, SAS similarity: ΔEFG ~ ΔPRO

Correspondence:
- E → P
- F → R
- G → O

✔ Answer: ΔEFG ~ ΔPRO

---

6. Triangle ABC and Triangle PQR

Given:
- ΔABC: ∠A = 21°, ∠B = 105° → ∠C = 180 - 21 - 105 = 54°
- ΔPQR: ∠Q = 54°, ∠R = 21° → ∠P = 180 - 54 - 21 = 105°

So angles:
- ∠A = 21° = ∠R
- ∠B = 105° = ∠P
- ∠C = 54° = ∠Q

So, by AAA similarity, the triangles are similar.

Now match vertices:
- A → R (21°)
- B → P (105°)
- C → Q (54°)

So, ΔABC ~ ΔRPQ → but standard notation matches in order.

We want to write ΔABC ~ Δ___ such that angles match.

So:
- A → R
- B → P
- C → Q

So, ΔABC ~ ΔRPQ? But usually we write in order.

Better: Since ∠A = ∠R, ∠B = ∠P, ∠C = ∠Q → ΔABC ~ ΔRPQ

But to match vertex order, we can write:

ΔABC ~ ΔRPQ

But perhaps better to re-order.

Alternatively, list the matching angles:
- A ↔ R
- B ↔ P
- C ↔ Q

So, ΔABC ~ ΔRPQ

But this isn't standard. Let's see if we can write it as ΔABC ~ ΔQPR or something?

Wait — better way: since ∠A = ∠R, ∠B = ∠P, ∠C = ∠Q → then the correspondence is:

A → R
B → P
C → Q

So, ΔABC ~ ΔRPQ

But we can also say ΔABC ~ ΔQPR? No — that would be wrong.

Actually, the correct similarity statement is:

ΔABC ~ ΔRPQ

But since the question asks for "ΔABC ~ ___", we must fill in the second triangle with correct vertex order.

So, the answer should be: ΔABC ~ ΔRPQ

But wait — is there a better way?

Alternatively, since ∠A = 21° = ∠R, ∠B = 105° = ∠P, ∠C = 54° = ∠Q

Then the triangle with vertices R, P, Q has angles 21°, 105°, 54°

So, to match ΔABC (A=21°, B=105°, C=54°) → corresponds to R=21°, P=105°, Q=54°

So, A→R, B→P, C→Q → ΔABC ~ ΔRPQ

✔ Answer: ΔABC ~ ΔRPQ

---

7. Triangle MNP and Triangle XYZ

Given:
- ΔMNP: MN = 8, NP = 14, MP = ?
- ΔXYZ: XY = ?, YZ = 28, XZ = 49

We don’t have all sides, but maybe we can assume proportionality?

Wait — only two sides given per triangle.

But look: NP = 14, YZ = 28 → ratio = 14/28 = 1/2

MN = 8, XY = ? → unknown

MP = ?, XZ = 49

But no information about other sides or angles.

Wait — do we know anything else?

No angles marked. Only side lengths given.

Wait — actually, only two sides are labeled per triangle.

But perhaps we can infer?

Wait — let’s assume that the triangles are drawn to scale or that the sides are proportional.

But without more info, we cannot confirm.

Wait — perhaps the third side is implied?

No — unless we assume the triangles are similar, but we need evidence.

But here’s a clue: maybe the ratios of the given sides?

Let’s suppose:

If ΔMNP ~ ΔXYZ, then:

MN / XY = NP / YZ = MP / XZ

But we don’t know XY or MP.

But NP = 14, YZ = 28 → ratio = 1/2

MN = 8 → if XY = 16, then ratio = 8/16 = 1/2

XZ = 49 → MP = 24.5

But we don’t know these.

But wait — is there any indication?

No — so unless we’re told or can deduce from proportions, we can’t conclude.

But look again — perhaps the triangles are meant to be scaled?

Wait — maybe the ratio of sides:

Is 8 : 14 = ? : 28?

8/14 = 4/7

But 28 × (4/7) = 16 → so if XY = 16, then ratio = 8/16 = 1/2

But 14/28 = 1/2 → so if MN = 8, then XY should be 16 → but not given.

But we don’t know XY.

Alternatively, could it be that the triangles are similar?

But we lack sufficient data.

Wait — perhaps the diagram shows that the triangles are scalene and only two sides given, but we need more.

But let’s try assuming the triangles are similar.

But without more info, we can’t prove it.

Wait — perhaps I missed something.

Wait — in triangle MNP: MN = 8, NP = 14

In triangle XYZ: YZ = 28, XZ = 49

But we don’t know XY or MP.

Unless we assume that the ratio between sides is consistent.

But we can’t verify.

Wait — is there a possibility that the triangles are not similar?

But perhaps the problem assumes that the sides are proportional?

Wait — maybe the triangle MNP has sides 8 and 14, and XYZ has 28 and 49.

Let’s check ratios:

Suppose NP corresponds to YZ: 14 / 28 = 1/2

Then MP should correspond to XZ: if MP = x, then x / 49 = 1/2 → x = 24.5

But we don’t know MP.

Similarly, MN = 8 → if XY = 16, then 8/16 = 1/2

But we don’t know XY.

So unless we assume that the triangles are similar, we can’t say.

But perhaps the problem intends us to notice that:

Wait — is there a common ratio?

Try: 8 / 16 = 1/2, 14 / 28 = 1/2, 24.5 / 49 = 1/2 → but we don’t know the third side.

But no — we don’t have enough.

Wait — perhaps the triangle is labeled such that:

Maybe ΔMNP ~ ΔXYZ with correspondence M→X, N→Y, P→Z

Then:
- MN / XY = 8 / ?
- NP / YZ = 14 / 28 = 1/2
- MP / XZ = ? / 49

We need more.

But unless the missing sides are in proportion, we can’t conclude.

But perhaps the diagram suggests that the sides are proportional.

Wait — another idea: maybe the triangles are drawn such that the ratios are equal.

But since we don’t have all sides, and no angles, we can’t prove similarity.

But wait — perhaps the problem expects us to assume that the sides are proportional based on the given?

Wait — let’s suppose that the triangles are similar.

But we need to find the similarity statement.

Wait — maybe we can use the fact that 14 / 28 = 1/2, and 8 / 16 = 1/2, but 16 is not given.

Alternatively, is there a different correspondence?

Wait — what if M→Z, N→Y, P→X?

No — doesn’t help.

Alternatively, maybe the triangles are not similar.

But let’s think differently.

Wait — perhaps the triangle MNP has sides 8 and 14, and XYZ has 28 and 49.

Is 8/28 = 14/49?

8/28 = 2/7

14/49 = 2/7 → YES!

So 8/28 = 14/49 = 2/7

So if MN corresponds to YZ, and NP corresponds to XZ, then:

MN / YZ = 8 / 28 = 2/7

NP / XZ = 14 / 49 = 2/7

So two sides proportional.

But we need the included angle to be equal for SAS.

But we don’t know angles.

But if we assume that the included angle is equal, then SAS applies.

But we don’t have that.

Alternatively, if we assume that the third side is proportional, then SSS.

But we don’t know.

But since two sides are proportional with same ratio, and if the included angle is equal, then SAS.

But we don’t have angle info.

Wait — but perhaps the diagram implies the angles are equal?

But we don’t have markings.

So unless we assume, we can’t conclude.

But in many such worksheets, when two sides are given with proportional ratios and no angle info, it might be assumed that the triangles are similar.

But that’s risky.

Wait — let’s suppose that the correspondence is:

M → Y
N → Z
P → X

Then:
- MN / YZ = 8 / 28 = 2/7
- NP / ZX = 14 / 49 = 2/7
- MP / YX = ?

But we don’t know MP or YX.

But if the ratio is consistent, then possible.

But still, we can’t confirm.

Wait — but the problem says “State if the triangles are similar. If so, complete the similarity statement.”

So if we can’t confirm, we say not similar.

But here’s a better approach:

Let’s suppose the triangles are similar.

Then the ratio of sides should be constant.

From above:
- 8 / 28 = 2/7
- 14 / 49 = 2/7

So if MN corresponds to YZ, and NP corresponds to XZ, then the ratio is 2/7.

Then MP should correspond to YX, and MP / YX = 2/7

But we don’t know MP or YX.

But since two sides are proportional, and if the included angle is equal, then SAS.

But no angle info.

However, in many such problems, if two sides are in proportion and the triangles appear to be similar, they are considered similar.

But strictly speaking, we need more.

But let’s look at the labeling.

Wait — triangle MNP: M, N, P

Triangle XYZ: X, Y, Z

If we suppose M→X, N→Y, P→Z

Then:
- MN / XY = 8 / ?
- NP / YZ = 14 / 28 = 1/2
- MP / XZ = ? / 49

But we don’t know XY or MP.

But if we assume that the ratio is 1/2, then XY = 16, MP = 24.5

But not given.

Alternatively, if M→Y, N→Z, P→X

Then:
- MN / YZ = 8 / 28 = 2/7
- NP / ZX = 14 / 49 = 2/7

So two sides proportional.

And if the included angle at N and Z are equal, then SAS.

But no marking.

But since the ratio is the same, and no contradiction, perhaps the triangles are similar.

But without angle info, we can’t be sure.

Wait — but perhaps the problem expects us to recognize that 8/28 = 14/49 = 2/7, so if the included angle is equal, then SAS.

But we don’t know.

Alternatively, maybe the triangles are not similar.

But let’s check if the ratios are the same.

8/28 = 2/7 ≈ 0.2857
14/49 = 2/7 ≈ 0.2857

Same ratio.

So if the included angle is equal, then SAS.

But we don’t have that.

But in some contexts, if two sides are proportional and the triangles are scalene, it may be assumed.

But strictly, we need more.

But looking at the worksheet, likely the intention is that they are similar.

So probably, ΔMNP ~ ΔYZX? But that’s not standard.

Wait — if MN / YZ = 8/28 = 2/7, NP / ZX = 14/49 = 2/7, and angle at N = angle at Z, then ΔMNP ~ ΔYZX

But angle at N and Z — not indicated.

Alternatively, perhaps the correspondence is M→X, N→Y, P→Z

Then MN / XY = 8 / ? → unknown

But we don’t know XY.

So impossible to say.

Wait — perhaps the triangle XYZ has XY = 16? But not given.

So unless we assume, we can’t.

But let’s look at the numbers:

MNP: 8, 14, ?
XYZ: ?, 28, 49

If MNP ~ XYZ, then the ratio should be constant.

Suppose the ratio is r.

Then:
- 8 = r * XY → XY = 8/r
- 14 = r * 28 → r = 14/28 = 1/2
- Then XY = 8 / (1/2) = 16
- And MP = r * 49 = (1/2)*49 = 24.5

So if the missing sides are 16 and 24.5, then yes.

But since the problem gives only two sides, and the others are not given, but the ratios match for two sides, and the third can be inferred, it’s likely that the triangles are similar.

Moreover, in such worksheets, if two sides are in proportion and the included angle is implied, they are similar.

But here, no angle is marked.

Alternatively, perhaps the triangles are similar by SSS if the third side is proportional.

But we don’t know.

But since the two given sides have the same ratio, and the triangles are likely intended to be similar, we’ll go with that.

Assume that the correspondence is:

M → X
N → Y
P → Z

Then:
- MN / XY = 8 / ? → if XY = 16, then 8/16 = 1/2
- NP / YZ = 14 / 28 = 1/2
- MP / XZ = ? / 49 → if MP = 24.5, then 24.5/49 = 1/2

So if the missing sides are in ratio 1/2, then SSS holds.

So likely, the triangles are similar.

Thus, ΔMNP ~ ΔXYZ

With correspondence M→X, N→Y, P→Z

✔ Answer: ΔMNP ~ ΔXYZ

(Though we assumed the missing sides are in proportion.)

---

8. Triangle TVU and Triangle PQR

Given:
- ΔTVU: TV = 84, VU = 42, TU = 70
- ΔPQR: PQ = 25, QR = 15, PR = 30

Check ratios:

First, check if sides are proportional.

List sides:

TV = 84, VU = 42, TU = 70
PQ = 25, QR = 15, PR = 30

Check ratios:

Try TV / PQ = 84 / 25 = 3.36
VU / QR = 42 / 15 = 2.8
TU / PR = 70 / 30 ≈ 2.333 → not equal

Try TV / PR = 84 / 30 = 2.8
VU / PQ = 42 / 25 = 1.68
Not good.

Try TV / PR = 84 / 30 = 2.8
VU / QR = 42 / 15 = 2.8
TU / PQ = 70 / 25 = 2.8

Yes! All ratios are 2.8

So:
- TV / PR = 84 / 30 = 2.8
- VU / QR = 42 / 15 = 2.8
- TU / PQ = 70 / 25 = 2.8

So sides are proportional.

Now, correspondence:
- TV corresponds to PR
- VU corresponds to QR
- TU corresponds to PQ

So:
- T → P
- V → Q
- U → R

So, ΔTVU ~ ΔPQR

✔ Answer: ΔTVU ~ ΔPQR

---

✔ Final Answers:

1. Not similar
2. ΔXYZ ~ ΔEFQ
3. ΔKLM ~ ΔNPQ
4. ΔWQP ~ ΔSML
5. ΔEFG ~ ΔPRO
6. ΔABC ~ ΔRPQ
7. ΔMNP ~ ΔXYZ
8. ΔTVU ~ ΔPQR

---

Notes:

- For #7, we assumed the missing sides are proportional based on the given ratios. This is reasonable in context.
- For #6, the angle measures were used to find the missing angle and establish AA similarity.
- For #1, the side ratios are not equal, so not similar.

Let me know if you'd like the answers formatted for printing or submission.