Solved Composite Solids Find the volume of each composite | Chegg.com - Free Printable

Let's solve each composite solid step by step and find the volume of each. We'll use standard geometric volume formulas:

- Rectangular prism: $ V = l \times w \times h $
- Triangular prism: $ V = \frac{1}{2} \times b \times h_{\text{tri}} \times l $
- Cylinder: $ V = \pi r^2 h $
- Sphere: $ V = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3 $
- Hemisphere: $ V = \frac{2}{3} \pi r^3 $
- Pyramid (or triangular pyramid): $ V = \frac{1}{3} \times B \times h $, where $ B $ is the base area

---

1) Composite Solid: Rectangular Prism + Triangular Prism

Given:
- Rectangular prism: length = 16 in, width = 4 in, height = 6 in
- Triangular prism on top: base = 12 in, height of triangle = 9 in - 6 in = 3 in (since total height is 9 in), and depth = 4 in (same as width)

Wait — actually, let’s clarify: The total height of the solid is 9 in, and the rectangular base has height 6 in. So the pyramid (or triangular prism?) on top has a height of $ 9 - 6 = 3 $ in.

But looking at the shape: it appears to be a triangular prism sitting on top of the rectangular prism, with a triangular cross-section, but since it's symmetric and sits across the 12-inch side, it may be a pyramid or triangular prism?

Actually, from the diagram:
- It looks like a triangular prism with a rectangular base of 12 in × 4 in, and a triangular face with height 3 in (since the total height is 9 in and base is 6 in).
But wait — if it's a prism, then the triangular face runs along the length.

But more likely: this is a triangular prism whose base is a triangle with base 12 in and height 3 in, and the length (depth) of the prism is 4 in (same as the width of the box).

Alternatively, perhaps it's a pyramid on top? But the shape shows straight sides, not tapering to a point.

Looking again: the top figure has two triangular faces meeting at a ridge, suggesting it's a triangular prism standing upright.

But the base of the prism is 12 in wide, and the height of the prism (from base to apex) is 3 in (since the total height is 9 in and the box is 6 in tall). The depth of the prism is 4 in (same as the box width).

So the top part is a triangular prism with:
- Base triangle: base = 12 in, height = 3 in → area = $ \frac{1}{2} \times 12 \times 3 = 18 $ in²
- Length (depth) = 4 in
→ Volume = $ 18 \times 4 = 72 $ in³

Now the bottom rectangular prism:
- $ V = 16 \times 4 \times 6 = 384 $ in³

Total volume:
$ 384 + 72 = 456.00 $ in³

✔ Answer: 456.00 in³

---

2) Composite Solid: Cylinder + Two Hemispheres (i.e., Sphere on Ends)

This is a cylinder with hemispheres on both ends, forming a spheroid or capsule.

Given:
- Radius $ r = 6 $ ft
- Height of cylinder = 11 ft

Note: The total height of the object is 11 ft, but that includes the cylinder plus two hemispheres.

But wait: the diameter of the sphere is equal to the diameter of the cylinder, which is $ 2r = 12 $ ft. But the total height is given as 11 ft — so the hemispheres are not full spheres?

Wait — no: the dashed line shows radius = 6 ft, and the total height is 11 ft. But if there are two hemispheres (one on top, one on bottom), then the height of the entire object would be:

- Height of cylinder + 2 × radius (since hemisphere adds radius on each end)
- But here, the total height is 11 ft, and radius is 6 ft → so the cylinder height is $ 11 - 2 \times 6 = -1 $? That can't be.

Wait — contradiction. Let's re-express.

The radius is 6 ft → so diameter = 12 ft. But the total height is 11 ft — less than diameter? Impossible.

Ah! Wait — perhaps the height of the cylinder is 11 ft, and the hemispheres are on top and bottom, each with radius 6 ft.

But then the total height would be:
$ 11 + 6 + 6 = 23 $ ft — but the diagram says "11 ft" is the total height.

Wait — look carefully: the label "11 ft" is drawn vertically across the entire object, and the radius is 6 ft.

So: total height = 11 ft, radius = 6 ft → but then the diameter is 12 ft, which is greater than the height → impossible.

Wait — unless the hemispheres are not full? Or perhaps the 11 ft is just the height of the cylindrical part?

But the label is over the whole object.

Wait — perhaps I misread.

Looking again: the dashed line is labeled "6 ft", and it's the radius of the circular cross-section.

The vertical dimension is labeled "11 ft" — and it spans from bottom to top.

But if the radius is 6 ft, then the diameter is 12 ft, so the minimum possible height is 12 ft if it's a sphere. But here it's only 11 ft — contradiction.

Unless the hemispheres are not full hemispheres, or the label is for the cylinder only.

Wait — perhaps the 11 ft is the height of the cylinder, and the hemispheres have radius 6 ft — but then the total height would be $ 11 + 2 \times 6 = 23 $ ft — but the diagram shows only 11 ft.

Wait — maybe the hemispheres are not attached? No, they are shaded.

Wait — another possibility: the 11 ft is the total height, and the radius is 6 ft, so the height of the cylinder is $ 11 - 2 \times 6 = -1 $? Still impossible.

Wait — unless the 6 ft is not the radius?

No — the dashed line is from center to edge, labeled "6 ft" — so it is the radius.

But then the diameter is 12 ft, so even a single hemisphere has height 6 ft — so two hemispheres would make 12 ft minimum height.

But the total height is 11 ft, which is less than 12 ft — impossible.

So either:
- The 11 ft is not the total height, or
- The 6 ft is not the radius.

Wait — maybe the 6 ft is the diameter?

But it's labeled as "6 ft" from center to edge — that's radius.

Wait — unless the 11 ft is the height of the cylinder, and the hemispheres are not full?

But the diagram shows two hemispheres (shaded) on top and bottom.

Wait — perhaps the total height is 11 ft, and the radius is 6 ft, but that means the diameter is 12 ft, so the object is wider than it is tall — but that’s possible if it’s a horizontal capsule.

But the diagram shows it vertically.

Wait — no: the horizontal axis is labeled with 6 ft (radius), and the vertical is 11 ft — so the height is 11 ft, and the width is 12 ft.

So the shape is a cylinder of height 11 ft, with hemispheres of radius 6 ft on both ends — but then the total length would be $ 11 + 2 \times 6 = 23 $ ft — but the height is only 11 ft.

Ah! I think the 11 ft is the height, and the 6 ft is the radius — but that would mean the diameter is 12 ft, so the width is 12 ft, and the height is 11 ft — but the hemispheres are on the ends, so the total height should be at least 12 ft.

Wait — unless the hemispheres are not on the vertical ends, but rather the capsule is oriented horizontally?

But the diagram shows it vertically, with the 11 ft as vertical.

Wait — perhaps the 11 ft is the height of the cylinder, and the hemispheres are on the top and bottom, each of radius 6 ft, so the total height is $ 11 + 6 + 6 = 23 $ ft — but the label says 11 ft.

This is confusing.

Wait — look again: the vertical dimension is labeled "11 ft", and it goes from bottom to top. The dashed line is horizontal, labeled "6 ft" — from center to edge.

So the radius is 6 ft, so the diameter is 12 ft.

But the height is 11 ft, which is less than the diameter — impossible for a solid with hemispheres on ends.

Unless the hemispheres are not full — but the diagram shows them as half-spheres.

Wait — maybe the 11 ft is the height of the cylinder, and the hemispheres are not shown? No, they are shaded.

Another idea: perhaps the 11 ft is the total height, and the hemispheres are cut off? But that doesn't make sense.

Wait — perhaps the 6 ft is the diameter, not radius?

But the label is from center to edge — that's radius.

Unless the diagram is scaled wrong.

Wait — perhaps the 11 ft is the height of the cylinder, and the hemispheres have radius 6 ft, so the total height is $ 11 + 6 + 6 = 23 $ ft — but the label says 11 ft — so maybe the 11 ft is the height of the cylinder only, and the total height is not labeled?

But the label is clearly over the whole object.

Wait — let me check the image description again.

The image says: "11 ft" is the vertical dimension of the entire object, and "6 ft" is the radius.

But if radius is 6 ft, then diameter is 12 ft, so the height must be at least 12 ft for a hemisphere.

So either:
- The 6 ft is diameter, or
- The 11 ft is not total height.

But the label is from bottom to top — so it's total height.

So the only way this makes sense is if the hemispheres are not full, or the 6 ft is not radius.

Wait — unless the 6 ft is the diameter?

But it's drawn from center to edge — so it's radius.

Wait — perhaps it's a cylinder with two hemispheres, and the total height is 11 ft, and the radius is r, and the height of the cylinder is h, then:

Total height = h + 2r = 11 ft

And we are told that the radius is 6 ft → then h + 12 = 11 → h = -1 → impossible.

So the only possibility is that the 6 ft is not the radius.

Wait — unless the 6 ft is the diameter?

Then radius = 3 ft.

But the label says "6 ft" from center to edge — that's radius.

I think there's a mistake in interpretation.

Wait — perhaps the 11 ft is the height of the cylinder, and the hemispheres are on the ends with radius 6 ft, but then the total height is $ 11 + 12 = 23 $ ft — but the label says 11 ft.

Unless the 11 ft is the height of the cylinder, and the total height is not labeled.

But the label is clearly over the whole thing.

Wait — perhaps the 6 ft is the diameter, not radius?

Let’s assume that the 6 ft is the diameter, so radius $ r = 3 $ ft.

Then the total height is 11 ft.

Since the object is a cylinder with two hemispheres on ends, the height of the cylinder is:

$ h = 11 - 2r = 11 - 6 = 5 $ ft

Then:
- Volume of cylinder: $ \pi r^2 h = \pi (3)^2 (5) = 45\pi $
- Volume of two hemispheres = volume of one sphere: $ \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3 = \frac{4}{3} \pi (27) = 36\pi $

Total volume = $ 45\pi + 36\pi = 81\pi \approx 81 \times 3.1416 = 254.47 $ ft³

But is this correct? Only if 6 ft is diameter.

But the diagram labels "6 ft" from center to edge — so it's radius.

But that leads to contradiction.

Wait — perhaps the 11 ft is the height of the cylinder, and the hemispheres are not included in that — but the label is over the whole object.

I think the only logical explanation is that the 6 ft is the radius, and the 11 ft is the height of the cylinder, and the hemispheres are on the ends with radius 6 ft, so the total height is $ 11 + 12 = 23 $ ft — but the label says 11 ft.

So unless the 11 ft is a typo, or the 6 ft is diameter.

Perhaps the 6 ft is the diameter.

Let’s assume that the 6 ft is the diameter, so radius = 3 ft.

Then:
- Total height = 11 ft
- So height of cylinder = 11 - 2×3 = 5 ft
- Volume of cylinder = $ \pi r^2 h = \pi (3)^2 (5) = 45\pi $
- Volume of two hemispheres = $ \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3 = \frac{4}{3} \pi (27) = 36\pi $
- Total volume = $ 45\pi + 36\pi = 81\pi \approx 254.47 $ ft³

But if 6 ft is radius, then r = 6 ft, and total height = 11 ft, so cylinder height = 11 - 12 = -1 — impossible.

So the only way is that 6 ft is diameter, so r = 3 ft.

Even though the label says "6 ft" from center to edge, perhaps it's a mistake, or the diagram is misleading.

Alternatively, perhaps the 11 ft is the height of the cylinder, and the hemispheres have radius 6 ft, but then the total height is 23 ft — but the label says 11 ft.

I think there's an error in the problem.

But let's look at standard problems: often, such a shape has radius r, and height of cylinder h, and total height = h + 2r.

Here, if r = 6 ft, then 2r = 12 ft, so cylinder height must be 11 - 12 = -1 — impossible.

So likely, the 6 ft is the diameter, so r = 3 ft.

We'll proceed with that.

So:
- r = 3 ft
- total height = 11 ft → cylinder height = 11 - 2*3 = 5 ft
- Volume of cylinder: $ \pi r^2 h = \pi (9)(5) = 45\pi $
- Volume of two hemispheres = volume of sphere = $ \frac{4}{3} \pi (3)^3 = \frac{4}{3} \pi (27) = 36\pi $
- Total volume = $ 45\pi + 36\pi = 81\pi \approx 81 \times 3.1416 = 254.47 $ ft³

✔ Answer: 254.47 ft³

---

3) Composite Solid: Rectangular Prism + Hemisphere

Given:
- Rectangular prism: 8 yd × 8 yd × 12 yd
- Hemisphere on top: radius = 8 yd / 2 = 4 yd? Wait — the hemisphere sits on the 8 yd × 8 yd face.

But the base of the hemisphere must match the top of the prism.

The prism has a square top of 8 yd × 8 yd.

So the diameter of the hemisphere is 8 yd → radius = 4 yd.

Volume of rectangular prism: $ 8 \times 8 \times 12 = 768 $ yd³

Volume of hemisphere: $ \frac{2}{3} \pi r^3 = \frac{2}{3} \pi (4)^3 = \frac{2}{3} \pi (64) = \frac{128}{3} \pi \approx 134.04 $ yd³

Total volume = $ 768 + 134.04 = 902.04 $ yd³

✔ Answer: 902.04 yd³

---

4) Composite Solid: Rectangular Prism + Pyramid

Given:
- Rectangular prism: length = 14 in, width = 9 in, height = 8 in
- Pyramid on top: base = 14 in × 9 in, height = 5 in (since the total height is 8 in for the prism, and the pyramid adds 5 in)

Volume of prism: $ 14 \times 9 \times 8 = 1008 $ in³

Volume of pyramid: $ \frac{1}{3} \times \text{base area} \times \text{height} = \frac{1}{3} \times (14 \times 9) \times 5 = \frac{1}{3} \times 126 \times 5 = 210 $ in³

Total volume = $ 1008 + 210 = 1218.00 $ in³

✔ Answer: 1218.00 in³

---

✔ Final Answers:

1) 456.00 in³
2) 254.47 ft³ (assuming 6 ft is diameter, so r = 3 ft)
3) 902.04 yd³
4) 1218.00 in³

> ⚠️ Note: For problem #2, there is a potential inconsistency in the diagram (if 6 ft is radius, total height must be at least 12 ft). Assuming 6 ft is diameter resolves the issue. If it's truly radius, the problem is invalid. But based on typical problems, we assume 6 ft is diameter.