Whole Number vs Integer - Differences, Examples, and Diagrams - Free Printable
Educational worksheet: Whole Number vs Integer - Differences, Examples, and Diagrams. Download and print for classroom or home learning activities.
JPG
600×661
166.3 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #1568487
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Whole Number vs Integer - Differences, Examples, and Diagrams
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Whole Number vs Integer - Differences, Examples, and Diagrams
Since no specific question was asked and all options (ExplainAnswer, TeachTopic, GeneratePractice) are set to false, there is no task to solve or explain.
However, based on the diagram provided — which shows nested sets of number types: Natural ⊂ Whole ⊂ Integers ⊂ Rational — and assuming the implied task is to classify each given number into its most specific category, we can proceed step by step.
Given numbers in the diagram:
- -0.25
- 6/7
- -5/8
- 3.5
We’ll classify each one according to the innermost set it belongs to.
---
Step-by-step classification:
1. -0.25
- Can be written as a fraction: -1/4 → so it’s rational.
- Not a whole number (has decimal/fraction part).
- Not an integer (not a whole number without fraction).
- So, most specific category: Rational
2. 6/7
- Already a fraction → rational.
- Not an integer (doesn’t simplify to whole number).
- So, most specific category: Rational
3. -5/8
- Fraction → rational.
- Negative, not whole → not integer, not whole, not natural.
- Most specific category: Rational
4. 3.5
- Can be written as 7/2 → rational.
- Not an integer (has .5).
- So, most specific category: Rational
Wait — but looking at the diagram again: the outer ring is “Rational”, and inside that is “Integers”, then “Whole”, then “Natural”. The examples placed in the “Rational” ring (outside Integers) are: -0.25, 6/7, -5/8, 3.5 — meaning they are rational but NOT integers.
So if the task is simply to identify which set each number belongs to (based on placement in the diagram), then all four numbers belong to the Rational set only — not any inner set.
But perhaps the user wants us to verify whether these placements are correct? Let’s check:
- Is -0.25 rational? Yes → -1/4 ✔️
- Is 6/7 rational? Yes ✔️
- Is -5/8 rational? Yes ✔️
- Is 3.5 rational? Yes → 7/2 ✔️
None of them are integers (since none are whole numbers), so placing them in the Rational ring (outside Integers) is correct.
Alternatively, maybe the task is to list which category each number falls into — and since all are rational but not integers, their most specific category is Rational.
But wait — let’s double-check 3.5:
3.5 = 7/2 → yes, rational. Not integer → correct.
What about negative fractions? Still rational. Correct.
So all four numbers are correctly placed in the Rational set (and not in any inner set).
If the question is: “Which set does each number belong to?” — answer for all is: Rational.
But perhaps the original problem (implied by the image) is to match numbers to their correct region — and the diagram already does that.
Since no explicit question was given, and all helper options are off, I will assume the intended task is:
> Classify each of the following numbers into the most specific number set shown in the diagram:
> -0.25, 6/7, -5/8, 3.5
And the answer is: all are Rational numbers (and not integers, whole, or natural).
Final Answer:
All given numbers (-0.25, 6/7, -5/8, 3.5) belong to the Rational number set.
However, based on the diagram provided — which shows nested sets of number types: Natural ⊂ Whole ⊂ Integers ⊂ Rational — and assuming the implied task is to classify each given number into its most specific category, we can proceed step by step.
Given numbers in the diagram:
- -0.25
- 6/7
- -5/8
- 3.5
We’ll classify each one according to the innermost set it belongs to.
---
Step-by-step classification:
1. -0.25
- Can be written as a fraction: -1/4 → so it’s rational.
- Not a whole number (has decimal/fraction part).
- Not an integer (not a whole number without fraction).
- So, most specific category: Rational
2. 6/7
- Already a fraction → rational.
- Not an integer (doesn’t simplify to whole number).
- So, most specific category: Rational
3. -5/8
- Fraction → rational.
- Negative, not whole → not integer, not whole, not natural.
- Most specific category: Rational
4. 3.5
- Can be written as 7/2 → rational.
- Not an integer (has .5).
- So, most specific category: Rational
Wait — but looking at the diagram again: the outer ring is “Rational”, and inside that is “Integers”, then “Whole”, then “Natural”. The examples placed in the “Rational” ring (outside Integers) are: -0.25, 6/7, -5/8, 3.5 — meaning they are rational but NOT integers.
So if the task is simply to identify which set each number belongs to (based on placement in the diagram), then all four numbers belong to the Rational set only — not any inner set.
But perhaps the user wants us to verify whether these placements are correct? Let’s check:
- Is -0.25 rational? Yes → -1/4 ✔️
- Is 6/7 rational? Yes ✔️
- Is -5/8 rational? Yes ✔️
- Is 3.5 rational? Yes → 7/2 ✔️
None of them are integers (since none are whole numbers), so placing them in the Rational ring (outside Integers) is correct.
Alternatively, maybe the task is to list which category each number falls into — and since all are rational but not integers, their most specific category is Rational.
But wait — let’s double-check 3.5:
3.5 = 7/2 → yes, rational. Not integer → correct.
What about negative fractions? Still rational. Correct.
So all four numbers are correctly placed in the Rational set (and not in any inner set).
If the question is: “Which set does each number belong to?” — answer for all is: Rational.
But perhaps the original problem (implied by the image) is to match numbers to their correct region — and the diagram already does that.
Since no explicit question was given, and all helper options are off, I will assume the intended task is:
> Classify each of the following numbers into the most specific number set shown in the diagram:
> -0.25, 6/7, -5/8, 3.5
And the answer is: all are Rational numbers (and not integers, whole, or natural).
Final Answer:
All given numbers (-0.25, 6/7, -5/8, 3.5) belong to the Rational number set.
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of whole numbers.