Identifying patterns worksheet with exercises on counting by intervals and completing sequences.
Worksheet titled "Identifying patterns" with sections for counting by various intervals and completing number patterns.
GIF
256×332
10.9 KB
Free · Personal Use
Quality Assured by Worksheets Library Team
Reviewed for educational accuracy and age-appropriateness
ID: #472708
⭐
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Identifying number patterns, numbers up to 60 | 3rd grade, 4th ...
▼
Show Answer Key & Explanations
Step-by-step solution for: Identifying number patterns, numbers up to 60 | 3rd grade, 4th ...
I will solve the problem presented in the image, which involves identifying and continuing numerical patterns in three separate tables.
The task is to fill in the blank cells in each table by identifying the underlying pattern. I'll tackle each table one by one, starting with the top one.
This table has two rows:
- Row 1 (Numerals of 6): 27, 24, 21, 18, __, __, __
- Row 2 (Numerals of 3): 15, 12, 9
Looking at the first row, the numbers are decreasing by 3 each time: 27 - 3 = 24, 24 - 3 = 21, 21 - 3 = 18. Following this pattern, the next numbers should be 15, 12, and 9.
The second row also decreases by 3: 15 - 3 = 12, 12 - 3 = 9. Since there are no blanks in this row, it serves as an example.
Solution for the first table:
The missing numbers in the first row are 15, 12, and 9.
---
This table has six rows, each with a different starting number and a pattern to continue.
Let's examine each row:
- Row 1: 0, 10, 20, __, __, __
- Pattern: Increasing by 10. So, the next numbers are 30, 40, 50.
- Row 2: 15, 10, __, __, __
- Pattern: Decreasing by 5. So, the next numbers are 5, 0, -5.
- Row 3: 5, 7, 9, __, __, __
- Pattern: Increasing by 2. So, the next numbers are 11, 13, 15.
- Row 4: 4, 9, 16, __, __, __
- This looks like squares: $2^2=4$, $3^2=9$, $4^2=16$. The next would be $5^2=25$, $6^2=36$, $7^2=49$.
- Row 5: 7, 14, __, __, __
- Pattern: Multiplying by 2 or increasing by 7. 7 + 7 = 14, so next is 21, 28, 35.
- Row 6: 4, 10, __, __, 19, __
- Let's find the pattern. From 4 to 10 is +6. If we assume a constant increase, let's check the gap to 19. There are two steps from 10 to 19, so 19 - 10 = 9, divided by 2 is 4.5. That doesn't seem right. Alternatively, maybe it's increasing by 3 each step? 4, then 4+6=10, then 10+3=13, 13+3=16, 16+3=19, then 19+3=22. That fits! So the pattern is +6, then +3 repeatedly. But that seems inconsistent. Another possibility: perhaps it's increasing by 6, then 3, then 3, then 3. Let me re-examine. From 4 to 10 is +6. Then if we add 3, we get 13, then 16, then 19 (which matches), then 22. So the pattern is +6, then +3 for the rest. But that's not a single consistent pattern. Perhaps it's a typo or a different pattern. Let me consider if it's arithmetic. The difference between 10 and 19 is 9 over 3 steps, so average 3 per step. So likely, it's 4, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22. I'll go with that.
Solution for the second table:
- Row 1: 30, 40, 50
- Row 2: 5, 0, -5
- Row 3: 11, 13, 15
- Row 4: 25, 36, 49
- Row 5: 21, 28, 35
- Row 6: 13, 16, 22
---
This table has six rows with various patterns.
- Row 1: 44, 36, 32, __, __, __
- Differences: 44 to 36 is -8, 36 to 32 is -4. Maybe the differences are halving? Next difference might be -2, then -1, then -0.5? That seems unlikely for a grade school worksheet. Perhaps it's decreasing by 8, then 4, then 2, then 1, etc. So 32 - 2 = 30, 30 - 1 = 29, 29 - 0.5 = 28.5? Not good. Another idea: maybe it's related to multiples or something else. Let's look at the other rows.
- Row 2: 33, 29, 25, __, __, __
- Decreasing by 4 each time: 33-4=29, 29-4=25, so next is 21, 17, 13.
- Row 3: 27, 23, 19, __, __, __
- Decreasing by 4: 27-4=23, 23-4=19, so next is 15, 11, 7.
- Row 4: 56, 46, 40, __, __, 16
- Differences: 56 to 46 is -10, 46 to 40 is -6. Maybe the differences are decreasing by 4? Next difference -2, then +2? That doesn't make sense. From 40 to 16 is -24 over 3 steps, so average -8 per step. But -10, -6, then perhaps -2, then +2? No. Let's see the final number is 16. If we assume a pattern of decreasing by 10, then 6, then 4, then 2, then 0? 40 - 4 = 36, 36 - 2 = 34, 34 - 0 = 34, but it should be 16. Not matching. Perhaps it's a different pattern. Another idea: maybe it's subtracting multiples of 2 or something. Let's calculate the total drop: 56 to 16 is -40 over 5 steps, so average -8. But the first two drops are -10 and -6, which average -8, so perhaps the next drops are -8, -8, -8? 40 - 8 = 32, 32 - 8 = 24, 24 - 8 = 16. Yes! That works. So the pattern is decreasing by 8 after the first two terms? But the first drop is -10, second is -6, then -8, -8, -8? That's inconsistent. Perhaps it's a mistake, or perhaps the pattern is not arithmetic. Let's look at the numbers: 56, 46, 40, ?, ?, 16. 56 - 46 = 10, 46 - 40 = 6, 40 - x = y, x - z = w, z - 16 = v. If we assume the differences are 10, 6, 4, 2, 0 or something. 10, 6, then 4 (40-4=36), then 2 (36-2=34), then 0 (34-0=34), but it should be 16. Not working. Perhaps it's 56, 46 (56-10), 40 (46-6), then 36 (40-4), 34 (36-2), 34 (34-0), but again not 16. I think there might be a typo, or perhaps I'm missing something. Let's move on and come back.
- Row 5: 49, 42, 35, __, __, __
- Decreasing by 7: 49-7=42, 42-7=35, so next is 28, 21, 14.
- Row 6: 29, 23, 22, __, __, 10
- Differences: 29 to 23 is -6, 23 to 22 is -1. Then to 10 is -12 over 3 steps. Not clear. Perhaps it's decreasing by 6, then 1, then 1, then 1, then 1? 22-1=21, 21-1=20, 20-1=19, but it should be 10. Not good. Another idea: maybe it's 29, 23 (29-6), 22 (23-1), then 21 (22-1), 20 (21-1), 19 (20-1), but again not 10. Perhaps the last number is a typo. Or perhaps the pattern is different. Let's assume it's decreasing by 6, then by 1 for the rest, but that doesn't reach 10. From 22 to 10 is -12 over 3 steps, so -4 per step. So 22-4=18, 18-4=14, 14-4=10. That works! So the pattern is -6, then -4, -4, -4. But why the change? Perhaps it's a mistake in the worksheet. I'll go with 18, 14, 10 for the last three, assuming the pattern changes after the first drop.
For Row 4, let's try the same logic. From 56 to 46 is -10, 46 to 40 is -6, then perhaps -4, -2, 0? But 40-4=36, 36-2=34, 34-0=34, not 16. Or perhaps -8, -8, -8 as I thought earlier: 40-8=32, 32-8=24, 24-8=16. Yes, that matches the last number. So even though the first two differences are -10 and -6, the pattern might be to decrease by 8 for the remaining terms. It's a bit inconsistent, but it works for the given endpoint.
For Row 1: 44, 36, 32. Differences: -8, -4. If we continue with -2, -1, -0.5, we get 30, 29, 28.5, which is not integer. Perhaps it's -8, -4, -2, -1, -0.5, but again not nice. Another idea: maybe it's related to binary or something, but unlikely. Perhaps it's 44, 36 (44-8), 32 (36-4), then 28 (32-4), 24 (28-4), 20 (24-4). But that would be -8, then -4, -4, -4, -4. That could be possible. Let's see if there's a better fit. Or perhaps the pattern is halving the difference: -8, then -4 (half), then -2, then -1, then -0.5. But for a worksheet, they might expect integers. I think for simplicity, I'll assume for Row 1 it's decreasing by 4 after the first drop: so 32-4=28, 28-4=24, 24-4=20.
But let's check the fourth row again. If we do 56, 46, 40, then 32, 24, 16, that's a nice pattern of decreasing by 8 from the third term. Similarly, for Row 1, if we do 44, 36, 32, then 28, 24, 20, that's decreasing by 4 from the third term. But the first drop is -8, which is larger. Perhaps the pattern is not consistent, but for the sake of completing the worksheet, I'll use the most logical continuation.
After re-evaluating, I think for Row 1, the intended pattern might be decreasing by 8, then by 4, then by 2, then by 1, etc., but since it's probably for younger students, they might expect a constant difference after the first few. However, looking at the other rows, most have constant differences. For Row 4, the only way to get to 16 is to decrease by 8 each time after the first two, so I'll use that. For Row 1, I'll use decreasing by 4: 28, 24, 20.
Solution for the third table:
- Row 1: 28, 24, 20 (assuming decrease by 4)
- Row 2: 21, 17, 13
- Row 3: 15, 11, 7
- Row 4: 32, 24, 16 (decreasing by 8 from the third term)
- Row 5: 28, 21, 14
- Row 6: 18, 14, 10 (decreasing by 4 from the third term)
---
Here are the completed tables:
First Table:
- Numerals of 6: 27, 24, 21, 18, 15, 12, 9
Second Table:
- Row 1: 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50
- Row 2: 15, 10, 5, 0, -5
- Row 3: 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15
- Row 4: 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49
- Row 5: 7, 14, 21, 28, 35
- Row 6: 4, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22
Third Table:
- Row 1: 44, 36, 32, 28, 24, 20
- Row 2: 33, 29, 25, 21, 17, 13
- Row 3: 27, 23, 19, 15, 11, 7
- Row 4: 56, 46, 40, 32, 24, 16
- Row 5: 49, 42, 35, 28, 21, 14
- Row 6: 29, 23, 22, 18, 14, 10
Note: Some patterns, particularly in the third table, involve assumptions due to ambiguous or inconsistent sequences. The solutions provided are the most logical based on the given numbers and common mathematical patterns.
The task is to fill in the blank cells in each table by identifying the underlying pattern. I'll tackle each table one by one, starting with the top one.
First Table: "Continue each pattern"
This table has two rows:
- Row 1 (Numerals of 6): 27, 24, 21, 18, __, __, __
- Row 2 (Numerals of 3): 15, 12, 9
Looking at the first row, the numbers are decreasing by 3 each time: 27 - 3 = 24, 24 - 3 = 21, 21 - 3 = 18. Following this pattern, the next numbers should be 15, 12, and 9.
The second row also decreases by 3: 15 - 3 = 12, 12 - 3 = 9. Since there are no blanks in this row, it serves as an example.
Solution for the first table:
The missing numbers in the first row are 15, 12, and 9.
---
Second Table: "Continue each pattern"
This table has six rows, each with a different starting number and a pattern to continue.
Let's examine each row:
- Row 1: 0, 10, 20, __, __, __
- Pattern: Increasing by 10. So, the next numbers are 30, 40, 50.
- Row 2: 15, 10, __, __, __
- Pattern: Decreasing by 5. So, the next numbers are 5, 0, -5.
- Row 3: 5, 7, 9, __, __, __
- Pattern: Increasing by 2. So, the next numbers are 11, 13, 15.
- Row 4: 4, 9, 16, __, __, __
- This looks like squares: $2^2=4$, $3^2=9$, $4^2=16$. The next would be $5^2=25$, $6^2=36$, $7^2=49$.
- Row 5: 7, 14, __, __, __
- Pattern: Multiplying by 2 or increasing by 7. 7 + 7 = 14, so next is 21, 28, 35.
- Row 6: 4, 10, __, __, 19, __
- Let's find the pattern. From 4 to 10 is +6. If we assume a constant increase, let's check the gap to 19. There are two steps from 10 to 19, so 19 - 10 = 9, divided by 2 is 4.5. That doesn't seem right. Alternatively, maybe it's increasing by 3 each step? 4, then 4+6=10, then 10+3=13, 13+3=16, 16+3=19, then 19+3=22. That fits! So the pattern is +6, then +3 repeatedly. But that seems inconsistent. Another possibility: perhaps it's increasing by 6, then 3, then 3, then 3. Let me re-examine. From 4 to 10 is +6. Then if we add 3, we get 13, then 16, then 19 (which matches), then 22. So the pattern is +6, then +3 for the rest. But that's not a single consistent pattern. Perhaps it's a typo or a different pattern. Let me consider if it's arithmetic. The difference between 10 and 19 is 9 over 3 steps, so average 3 per step. So likely, it's 4, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22. I'll go with that.
Solution for the second table:
- Row 1: 30, 40, 50
- Row 2: 5, 0, -5
- Row 3: 11, 13, 15
- Row 4: 25, 36, 49
- Row 5: 21, 28, 35
- Row 6: 13, 16, 22
---
Third Table: "Continue each pattern"
This table has six rows with various patterns.
- Row 1: 44, 36, 32, __, __, __
- Differences: 44 to 36 is -8, 36 to 32 is -4. Maybe the differences are halving? Next difference might be -2, then -1, then -0.5? That seems unlikely for a grade school worksheet. Perhaps it's decreasing by 8, then 4, then 2, then 1, etc. So 32 - 2 = 30, 30 - 1 = 29, 29 - 0.5 = 28.5? Not good. Another idea: maybe it's related to multiples or something else. Let's look at the other rows.
- Row 2: 33, 29, 25, __, __, __
- Decreasing by 4 each time: 33-4=29, 29-4=25, so next is 21, 17, 13.
- Row 3: 27, 23, 19, __, __, __
- Decreasing by 4: 27-4=23, 23-4=19, so next is 15, 11, 7.
- Row 4: 56, 46, 40, __, __, 16
- Differences: 56 to 46 is -10, 46 to 40 is -6. Maybe the differences are decreasing by 4? Next difference -2, then +2? That doesn't make sense. From 40 to 16 is -24 over 3 steps, so average -8 per step. But -10, -6, then perhaps -2, then +2? No. Let's see the final number is 16. If we assume a pattern of decreasing by 10, then 6, then 4, then 2, then 0? 40 - 4 = 36, 36 - 2 = 34, 34 - 0 = 34, but it should be 16. Not matching. Perhaps it's a different pattern. Another idea: maybe it's subtracting multiples of 2 or something. Let's calculate the total drop: 56 to 16 is -40 over 5 steps, so average -8. But the first two drops are -10 and -6, which average -8, so perhaps the next drops are -8, -8, -8? 40 - 8 = 32, 32 - 8 = 24, 24 - 8 = 16. Yes! That works. So the pattern is decreasing by 8 after the first two terms? But the first drop is -10, second is -6, then -8, -8, -8? That's inconsistent. Perhaps it's a mistake, or perhaps the pattern is not arithmetic. Let's look at the numbers: 56, 46, 40, ?, ?, 16. 56 - 46 = 10, 46 - 40 = 6, 40 - x = y, x - z = w, z - 16 = v. If we assume the differences are 10, 6, 4, 2, 0 or something. 10, 6, then 4 (40-4=36), then 2 (36-2=34), then 0 (34-0=34), but it should be 16. Not working. Perhaps it's 56, 46 (56-10), 40 (46-6), then 36 (40-4), 34 (36-2), 34 (34-0), but again not 16. I think there might be a typo, or perhaps I'm missing something. Let's move on and come back.
- Row 5: 49, 42, 35, __, __, __
- Decreasing by 7: 49-7=42, 42-7=35, so next is 28, 21, 14.
- Row 6: 29, 23, 22, __, __, 10
- Differences: 29 to 23 is -6, 23 to 22 is -1. Then to 10 is -12 over 3 steps. Not clear. Perhaps it's decreasing by 6, then 1, then 1, then 1, then 1? 22-1=21, 21-1=20, 20-1=19, but it should be 10. Not good. Another idea: maybe it's 29, 23 (29-6), 22 (23-1), then 21 (22-1), 20 (21-1), 19 (20-1), but again not 10. Perhaps the last number is a typo. Or perhaps the pattern is different. Let's assume it's decreasing by 6, then by 1 for the rest, but that doesn't reach 10. From 22 to 10 is -12 over 3 steps, so -4 per step. So 22-4=18, 18-4=14, 14-4=10. That works! So the pattern is -6, then -4, -4, -4. But why the change? Perhaps it's a mistake in the worksheet. I'll go with 18, 14, 10 for the last three, assuming the pattern changes after the first drop.
For Row 4, let's try the same logic. From 56 to 46 is -10, 46 to 40 is -6, then perhaps -4, -2, 0? But 40-4=36, 36-2=34, 34-0=34, not 16. Or perhaps -8, -8, -8 as I thought earlier: 40-8=32, 32-8=24, 24-8=16. Yes, that matches the last number. So even though the first two differences are -10 and -6, the pattern might be to decrease by 8 for the remaining terms. It's a bit inconsistent, but it works for the given endpoint.
For Row 1: 44, 36, 32. Differences: -8, -4. If we continue with -2, -1, -0.5, we get 30, 29, 28.5, which is not integer. Perhaps it's -8, -4, -2, -1, -0.5, but again not nice. Another idea: maybe it's related to binary or something, but unlikely. Perhaps it's 44, 36 (44-8), 32 (36-4), then 28 (32-4), 24 (28-4), 20 (24-4). But that would be -8, then -4, -4, -4, -4. That could be possible. Let's see if there's a better fit. Or perhaps the pattern is halving the difference: -8, then -4 (half), then -2, then -1, then -0.5. But for a worksheet, they might expect integers. I think for simplicity, I'll assume for Row 1 it's decreasing by 4 after the first drop: so 32-4=28, 28-4=24, 24-4=20.
But let's check the fourth row again. If we do 56, 46, 40, then 32, 24, 16, that's a nice pattern of decreasing by 8 from the third term. Similarly, for Row 1, if we do 44, 36, 32, then 28, 24, 20, that's decreasing by 4 from the third term. But the first drop is -8, which is larger. Perhaps the pattern is not consistent, but for the sake of completing the worksheet, I'll use the most logical continuation.
After re-evaluating, I think for Row 1, the intended pattern might be decreasing by 8, then by 4, then by 2, then by 1, etc., but since it's probably for younger students, they might expect a constant difference after the first few. However, looking at the other rows, most have constant differences. For Row 4, the only way to get to 16 is to decrease by 8 each time after the first two, so I'll use that. For Row 1, I'll use decreasing by 4: 28, 24, 20.
Solution for the third table:
- Row 1: 28, 24, 20 (assuming decrease by 4)
- Row 2: 21, 17, 13
- Row 3: 15, 11, 7
- Row 4: 32, 24, 16 (decreasing by 8 from the third term)
- Row 5: 28, 21, 14
- Row 6: 18, 14, 10 (decreasing by 4 from the third term)
---
Final Answer
Here are the completed tables:
First Table:
- Numerals of 6: 27, 24, 21, 18, 15, 12, 9
Second Table:
- Row 1: 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50
- Row 2: 15, 10, 5, 0, -5
- Row 3: 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15
- Row 4: 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49
- Row 5: 7, 14, 21, 28, 35
- Row 6: 4, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22
Third Table:
- Row 1: 44, 36, 32, 28, 24, 20
- Row 2: 33, 29, 25, 21, 17, 13
- Row 3: 27, 23, 19, 15, 11, 7
- Row 4: 56, 46, 40, 32, 24, 16
- Row 5: 49, 42, 35, 28, 21, 14
- Row 6: 29, 23, 22, 18, 14, 10
Note: Some patterns, particularly in the third table, involve assumptions due to ambiguous or inconsistent sequences. The solutions provided are the most logical based on the given numbers and common mathematical patterns.
Parent Tip: Review the logic above to help your child master the concept of math patterns worksheet grade 4.